Pat White wrote: > Actually, I don't find vibration to be that much of an issue on > the 6x7. It > could be that MLU was added because a professional camera really > should have > it, to make the camera suitable for the most demanding applications.
I bought my non MLU for landscape photography, and it is always tripod mounted - vibration is not an issue for me. The larger negative or slide is far superior to 35mm for this part of my hobby. > > As for the film transport, several people have mentioned that the most > significant upgrade came with the 67II, and that the 67 is better than the > 6x7, but still not perfect. No problems with mine so far. Apart from loading the first film (!), I have had no problems. > > The early cameras are definitely less expensive, and I'm pleased > with mine. > Also, all the lenses fit all the cameras, so once you're into the system, > you can get a later body when it suits your budget. I want another body so I can shoot slide and B&W of the same scenes. Because I find the 67 body I have no problem, and the non MLU is not favoured and therefore cheaper, I'll be acquiring another. Malcolm
