Hello Patrick, On Nov 2, 2012, at 17:10 , Patrick Domack wrote:
> I have been adjusting the source to increase the negative cache size, for > when quering against rbl's > > From my stats, it seems to me that the negative cache is not part of the > positive cache, but totally different cache area/counters. > > So it seems the real max-cache-size = max-cache-size * 110% (as the negative > cache is hard coded at 10% of the max-cache-size currently). > > I adjusted my source, so I could specify the negative cache size as a > percentage of the max-cache-size, but as it seems to be different, I'm > wondering if my patch (before I submit it in a feature request) should be > changed to a negative-cache-size, that would just default to the current > behavure. Concrete numbers are usually better than percentages of other numbers. In any case, please submit your patch at wiki.powerdns.com so people can look at it! Kind regards, -- Peter van Dijk Netherlabs Computer Consulting BV - http://www.netherlabs.nl/ _______________________________________________ Pdns-dev mailing list Pdns-dev@mailman.powerdns.com http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-dev
