On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 03:31:20AM +0200, Alex van den Bogaerdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 20 lines which said:
> > We would like to migrate our existing BIND setup to PowerDNS, but > > I first need to prove that PowerDNS will return the same answers > > that BIND does for a given set of zones. > > I don't know about such a tool, but I do know that pdns does not > behave in the same way as bind. And the problem with Augie Schwer's idea is that it is perfectly legal to *not* behave exactly like BIND, since the DNS standard leaves many options open. BIND 9 does not behave like BIND 8, by far (many oif our registrars' scripts broke when we moved our servers to BIND 9). Check ".fr" or ".", which have a mix of name servers. You'll see they do not reply the same. > A domain without any resource record (a legal situation) is reported > to not exist according to pdns. This is a bug (although one which is unlikely to occur in the real world), not a legal difference in behavior. _______________________________________________ Pdns-users mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
