>>>>> "bh" == bert hubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
bh> However, for a reality check, do realise the DNSSEC people decided bh> not to take advantage of binary labels, but use base32 encoding, bh> and packet size is of concern to them. They might've used base204 bh> encoding, which would've led to lots smaller packets. I am sure you will agree with me that in general, the decisions of "the DNSSEC people" are not exactly holy gospel. Also note that base204 would cut packet sizes by a third perhaps. Not exactly fantastic. bh> End to end UTF-8 DNS w/o IDN is not around the corner, and not bh> just because of PowerDNS. I use it sometimes for fun for my home domain. /Benny _______________________________________________ Pdns-users mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
