Not sure who's right/wrong here, but it is something on which bind and pdns-recursor disagree.
Using bind as the nameserver: $ dig sexybits.de ; <<>> DiG 9.4.1-P1 <<>> sexybits.de ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 380 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;sexybits.de. IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION: sexybits.de. 600 IN A 82.98.86.165 ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: sexybits.de. 86400 IN NS ns2.sedoparking.com. sexybits.de. 86400 IN NS ns1.sedoparking.com. ;; Query time: 695 msec ;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1) ;; WHEN: Mon Sep 17 11:33:25 2007 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 96 Whereas pdns-recursor times out and gives: DNS parser error: sexycash.de., Parsing record content: expected digits at position 28 in 'ns9.ns14.de. ms.mindbits.de^M. 2006120902 10000 14400 604800 86400' -- Alex Kiernan _______________________________________________ Pdns-users mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
