On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:24:57 +0100
"Alex Kiernan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On 15/10/2007, Darren Gamble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The issue is, quite simply, that doing this has higher resourcing
> > requirements and higher latency than simply having "plain" caches behind
> > the load balancer.  I believe Bert would echo this as well.
> >
Hi all,

Thanks for your replies,

It was not my idea but that of management. I have enough information to tell 
them what I said in the first place. Not worth the hassle.


Cheers

-- 
Mick Pollard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Attachment: pgphiGx085z4l.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Pdns-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users

Reply via email to