-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Eugene Pefti wrote: | That's a good point, Hugo. IPv6 is behind the corner. | Which of the above said front-end supports this RR?
Well it seems it is peanuts to add proper IPv6 support to pdns. I have done so in my own config and am testing it before I will submit a patch. In fact it ignores some other RR's as well. And IPv6 is not around the corner. It is here right now. I have it at home and on my hosted servers. Hugo. PS: Please respect my Reply-To: header and use the mailinglist only. - -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/ PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc A: Yes. >Q: Are you sure? >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHoXA1BvzDRVjxmYERAiTDAJ9Wsv/ubZvocwH5dO13ZFMnmWzMjQCeObA1 MEshofl4qn8emHQOLra64R8= =56+e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Pdns-users mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
