So we use the fork command with the recursor which appears to improve performamce. But what I have noticed is that the forked process appears to get most of the requests as shown here:
Primary: rec_control --socket-dir=/var/run/recursor1/ --socket-pid=20858 get all-outqueries 180275 Fork: rec_control --socket-dir=/var/run/recursor1/ --socket-pid=20859 get all-outqueries 1446331 Primary: rec_control --socket-dir=/var/run/recursor2/ --socket-pid=20862 get all-outqueries 147774 Fork: rec_control --socket-dir=/var/run/recursor2/ --socket-pid=20863 get all-outqueries 1464076 I have 2 servers each running two daemons in a forked configuration. Each daemon has it's own IP. These are then all load-balanced with Foundry SI400's. All of them show this. I know the forking was just a hack, and it does seem to improve performance. Is this just how this works and I should just let it be or is it not sharing the load? Thanks. Brad Dameron Senior Systems Engineer Clearw're _______________________________________________ Pdns-users mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
