On 10 Nov 2010 wk 45, at 16:14, Atha Kouroussis wrote: > Hi Nick, > thank you for your quick answer! > > Obviously I didn't make myself clear in my email, since the second scenario > we are contemplating, is very similar to what you described: one master > backend, and then each pdns server each with its own slave backend. And I do > see the advantages in robustness and performance of this type of scenario. > MySQL replication (master-slave) is not an issue for us. We are battle > seasoned on that front. > > What I can't really fit in this scenario is slave updates, unless having a > dedicated pdns server talking to the master backend just for this purpose. > Multiple slaves would require either master-master replication (not something > we want to pursue) or multiple instances of pdns talking to the same master > backend. Thanks for your help.
Atha, why would you need master-master? Frank -- Frank Louwers Operations -- Openminds bvba http://openminds.be [email protected] +32.9 225 82 91 Schrijf je nu in op onze nieuwsbrief: http://openminds.be/nieuwsbrief
_______________________________________________ Pdns-users mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
