Moin Bert, On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 03:15:27PM +0200, bert hubert wrote: > On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 01:04:51AM +0200, erkan yanar wrote: > > As Im missing any good data I created 6*10^6 entries for domains and > > for every domain some entries in the records-table (about 66*10^6) > > That is a pretty good test! 6 million domains is around 2 million domains > smaller than the largest deployment we know of. > > > Queries per second: 10923.212970 qps > > Interesting. Post 3.0 we will be focussing on performance for a few > releases. It may well be that we'll add guidance on which indexes to use.
In fact I did a new test (on sunday azlev forced me to use -q :): # ./dnsperf -d /var/tmp/pdns.list -q 4000 -s localhost DNS Performance Testing Tool Nominum Version 1.0.1.0 [Status] Processing input data [Status] Sending queries (to 127.0.0.1) [Status] Testing complete Statistics: Parse input file: once Ended due to: reaching end of file Queries sent: 494969 queries Queries completed: 494969 queries Queries lost: 0 queries Avg request size: 55 bytes Avg response size: 81 bytes Percentage completed: 100.00% Percentage lost: 0.00% Started at: Sun Apr 24 02:50:44 2011 Finished at: Sun Apr 24 02:51:05 2011 Ran for: 21.518132 seconds Queries per second: 23002.414894 qps With pdns-cache it was easy doubled (with up to 1% Packet lost). > > > As I miss live/real data I would like to get into contact with some > > live/real-data. > > You can use tcpdump & dnsreplay perhaps? Naa Im just a little dba. In fact I own 5 domains:) Erkan _______________________________________________ Pdns-users mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
