On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 07:38:49PM +0100, AJ McKee wrote: > +1 for DNAME support but I like the pipe backend idea. Still would be > cute to have it built into pdns. I am seeing a lot of scenarios where > this may be useful now. > > AJ
I do not know how useful DNAME support is given the dearth of requests for it. A lua or pipe backend implementation does not seem terribly difficult. Maybe someone interested in DNAME support would write one and contribute the code for all to use. Regards, Ken _______________________________________________ Pdns-users mailing list Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
