On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 21:21:59 +0300, Aki Tuomi wrote: > On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 09:08:45PM +0300, Aki Tuomi wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 07:03:08PM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote: >> > Aki Tuomi recently submitted a patch that presumably removes that limit= > ation - at least for any combination of gsql backends with the bindbackend = > (as long as bind is the last in the launch line, as far as I can judge. I'm= > sure he will correct me if I'm wrong). The ticket and patch are at http://= > wiki.powerdns.com/trac/ticket/513 >> It should work either way, even if you launch bind first or last. It just= > And sadly, now that I look at the bind backend, I see it has the very same > bug as gsql. Luckily there is a patch for this as well. > http://wiki.powerdns.com/trac/ticket/523
It seems to work if I apply only the patch from http://wiki.powerdns.com/trac/ticket/513 and launch the bind backend last. The patch in http://wiki.powerdns.com/trac/ticket/523 actually breaks DNSSEC for bind completely (mainly because it tries to check for NSEC3PARAMS when loading the zones - but getDomainMetadata returns false at that point because the zone hasn't been loaded yet). And pdnssec is also broken for bind zones with that patch (as it doesn't load all zones upfront). Christof -- http://cmeerw.org sip:cmeerw at cmeerw.org mailto:cmeerw at cmeerw.org xmpp:cmeerw at cmeerw.org _______________________________________________ Pdns-users mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
