On 9/3/12 8:05 PM, "Seema Datar" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > Thanks for the response. Which one of these lists should I send questions > to? > > To clarify the question further - > > With the DSEC option, I see 2 packets returned probably because it does not > understand the option. If you notice, " m.root-servers.net" appears in the > second part of the response. This is a response to a single dig query. The > part which does contain " m.root-servers.net" does not have an ANSWER > section. The forst part which has the ANSWER section has entries only upto > l.root-servers.net. In PDNS-2.99.2, I did not see this difference. > > > ; <<>> DiG 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-20.P1.el5_8.1 <<>> @localhost xxx DSEC > ; (1 server found) > ;; global options: printcmd > ;; Got answer: > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 30600 > ;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 13, ADDITIONAL: 12 > > ;; QUESTION SECTION: > ;xxx. IN A > > ;; ANSWER SECTION: > xxx. 300 IN CNAME xxx.y.com. > > ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: > . 518400 IN NS a.root-servers.net. > . 518400 IN NS b.root-servers.net. > . 518400 IN NS c.root-servers.net. > . 518400 IN NS d.root-servers.net. > . 518400 IN NS e.root-servers.net. > . 518400 IN NS f.root-servers.net. > . 518400 IN NS g.root-servers.net. > . 518400 IN NS h.root-servers.net. > . 518400 IN NS i.root-servers.net. > . 518400 IN NS j.root-servers.net. > . 518400 IN NS k.root-servers.net. > . 518400 IN NS l.root-servers.net. > . 518400 IN NS m.root-servers.net. > > ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: > a.root-servers.net. 3600000 IN A 192.1.1.1 > b.root-servers.net. 3600000 IN A 192.1.1.2 > c.root-servers.net. 3600000 IN A 192.1.1.3 > d.root-servers.net. 3600000 IN A 192.1.1.4 > e.root-servers.net. 3600000 IN A 192.1.1.5 > f.root-servers.net. 3600000 IN A 192.1.1.6 > g.root-servers.net. 3600000 IN A 192.1.1.7 > h.root-servers.net. 3600000 IN A 192.1.1.8 > i.root-servers.net. 3600000 IN A 192.1.1.9 > j.root-servers.net. 3600000 IN A 192.1.1.10 > k.root-servers.net. 3600000 IN A 192.1.1.11 > l.root-servers.net. 3600000 IN A 192.1.1.12 > > ;; Query time: 4 msec > ;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1) > ;; WHEN: Mon Sep 3 07:28:41 2012 > ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 477 > > ;; Got answer: > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 19923 > ;; flags: qr rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 13, ADDITIONAL: 13 > > ;; QUESTION SECTION: > ;DSEC. IN A > > ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: > . 518400 IN NS a.root-servers.net. > . 518400 IN NS b.root-servers.net. > . 518400 IN NS c.root-servers.net. > . 518400 IN NS d.root-servers.net. > . 518400 IN NS e.root-servers.net. > . 518400 IN NS f.root-servers.net. > . 518400 IN NS g.root-servers.net. > . 518400 IN NS h.root-servers.net. > . 518400 IN NS i.root-servers.net. > . 518400 IN NS j.root-servers.net. > . 518400 IN NS k.root-servers.net. > . 518400 IN NS l.root-servers.net. > . 518400 IN NS m.root-servers.net. > > ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: > a.root-servers.net. 3600000 IN A 192.1.1.1 > b.root-servers.net. 3600000 IN A 192.1.1.2 > c.root-servers.net. 3600000 IN A 192.1.1.3 > d.root-servers.net. 3600000 IN A 192.1.1.4 > e.root-servers.net. 3600000 IN A 192.1.1.5 > f.root-servers.net. 3600000 IN A 192.1.1.6 > g.root-servers.net. 3600000 IN A 192.1.1.7 > h.root-servers.net. 3600000 IN A 192.1.1.8 > i.root-servers.net. 3600000 IN A 192.1.1.9 > j.root-servers.net. 3600000 IN A 192.1.1.10 > k.root-servers.net. 3600000 IN A 192.1.1.11 > l.root-servers.net. 3600000 IN A 192.1.1.12 > m.root-servers.net. 3600000 IN A 192.1.1.13 > > ;; Query time: 3 msec > ;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1) > ;; WHEN: Mon Sep 3 07:28:41 2012 > ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 441 > > Thanks, > Seema > > > > On 9/3/12 3:30 PM, "[email protected]" > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Send Pdns-users mailing list submissions to >> [email protected] >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> [email protected] >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> [email protected] >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of Pdns-users digest..." >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. Question regarding the additional section (Seema Datar) >> 2. Re: Question regarding the additional section (Peter van Dijk) >> 3. Re: Strange pdns-recursor crash (Peter van Dijk) >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 11:03:30 +0530 >> From: Seema Datar <[email protected]> >> Subject: [Pdns-users] Question regarding the additional section >> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> Cc: "[email protected]" >> <[email protected]> >> Message-ID: <cc6a3f02.37dac%[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >> >> Hi, >> >> I had a question regarding the MSG size in PDNS v3. I see that when the >> query does not result in an answer section, the ADDITONAL section is >> complete with all the entries and the MSG size happens to be 437. However, >> when the answer section exists, it skips some of the entries in the >> ADDITIONAL section and the total MSG size is limited to 477. >> >> I did not see this behavior in PDNS v2. The question is, in the v3 version, >> is the message size being limited which results in certain entries being >> skipped in the ADDITIONAL section? >> >> >> Thanks, >> Seema >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 2 >> Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 09:11:01 +0200 >> From: Peter van Dijk <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [Pdns-users] Question regarding the additional section >> To: pdns-users Users <[email protected]> >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >> >> Hello Seema, >> >> please don't post to both lists. We'd rather have a question on the wrong >> list >> than a thread split between both lists. >> >> On Sep 3, 2012, at 7:33 , Seema Datar wrote: >> >>> I had a question regarding the MSG size in PDNS v3. I see that when the >>> query does not result in an answer section, the ADDITONAL section is >>> complete with all the entries and the MSG size happens to be 437. However, >>> when the answer section exists, it skips some of the entries in the >>> ADDITIONAL section and the total MSG size is limited to 477. >>> >>> I did not see this behavior in PDNS v2. The question is, in the v3 version, >>> is the message size being limited which results in certain entries being >>> skipped in the ADDITIONAL section? >> >> >> I'd be happy to look into this, but it would help if you had concrete >> examples, preferably from the same zone. Can you provide this? >> >> Kind regards, > _______________________________________________ Pdns-users mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
