On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 07:55:01PM +0100, a b wrote: > > You could do the replication in the database (e.g. postgresql with > > slony). Then you do not need the supermaster feature. > > That is something we are actually trying to avoid at all costs: we > have Oracle doing regular notify and transfer requests on port 53. > > We explicitly do not want to depend on any particular database > features for DNS records' replication.
Would it be feasible to build a fully RFC 1925 (6a) [1] compliant solution? (1) Have a supermaster SM run from Oracle (2) Have a single superslave SS run against the supermaster, replicating via DNS (3) Have SS run against a MySQL backend which does MySQL replication to your normal slaves NS1 up to NSx. That way, you only have to clean up one superslave, and you don't "depend" on MySQL as you can easily replace the MySQL setup with any other replication mechanismus including something resembling your existing supermaster/superslave setup without having to touch the Oracle - SM setup. Greetings Marc [1] It is always possible to add another level of indirection -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 31958061 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 621 31958062 _______________________________________________ Pdns-users mailing list Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users