On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:46:12PM +0100, Marten Lehmann wrote: > Hello, > > after our migration from PowerDNS 2.9.21 to 3.1 we just noticed > another unexpected behaviour. If a TXT record for a subdomain is > defined, a wildcard at the same subdomain level is ignored.
This is correct DNS behaviour. The label exists, so we're done. > What is the reason to introduce this behaviour? I think BIND has the > "bug", meaning that once an explicit subdomain is found, further > wildcards are ignored, even they do have a different type. I was > happy that earlier PowerDNS releases implemented it the way one > would intuitivly expect. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1034.txt - 4.3.2, step 3.c spells out what we have to do. Sorry! Bert -- PowerDNS Website: http://www.powerdns.com/ PowerDNS Community Website: http://wiki.powerdns.com/ PowerDNS is supported and developed by Netherlabs: http://www.netherlabs.nl _______________________________________________ Pdns-users mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
