On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 06:05:39PM +0200, Aleksey Chudov wrote: > There is several problems if launch JVM directly from PowerDNS
Indeed, these are all very convincing. In revision 3111 you'll find a version of PowerDNS that can connect to a UNIX socket if you feed one as the pipe-command. It also merges your split argument patch. Revision 3111 can be compiled as tar.gz, rpm or deb from: https://autotest.powerdns.com/ Can you test? Bert > 1. multiple independent JVM processes consume much more memory > 2. our application checks the status of the remote servers. So, when > run multiple instances the number of tests increases respectively > and/or we need to synchronize instances with each other. This > complicates the program > 3. currently we use the JVM stdout for logging. it is convenient and > work for all our applications > > I could probably think of some more examples of why we would like to > use a single JVM application per server and unix socket for > communication with PowerDNS :) > > Aleksey > _______________________________________________ Pdns-users mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
