I use MySQL replication between central US and western US and between central US and Germany. Never had a problem—not even once. I _did_ have occasional problems when I was replicating between the central US and the Netherlands, but those problems went away when I moved my Netherlands-based DNS server to Germany.
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Dan Campbell <[email protected]> wrote: > I use MySQL replication between western US and Ireland -- never had a > problem. > > -- > Dan Campbell > > > On Apr 14, 2015, at 8:10 AM, Robert Locke <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi Peter, > > > > I’ve used native replication (mysql) across data centers (and even an > ocean!) without any issues. > > > > Cheers, > > Rob > > > > > >> On Apr 14, 2015, at 4:58 PM, Keresztes Péter-Zoltán <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> My setup should be fairly easy. I don’t replicate with third pary DNS > servers. My replications between DC’s are done via VPN lines. So far in 6 > months they did not go down ones so I can consider them pretty reliable. > >> > >> Peter > >>> On 14 Apr 2015, at 11:53, Aki Tuomi <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> It really all depends on your use case. > >>> > >>> You probably do not want native replication if you need to replicate > >>> > >>> - with other than same DNS product > >>> - with 3rd parties > >>> - over some unreliable WAN links > >>> > >>> or if you cannot (for some reason) establish the connections required > for > >>> native replication, such as corporate policy or something silly like > that. > >>> > >>> Aki > >>> > >>>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 11:45:53AM +0300, Keresztes Péter-Zoltán > wrote: > >>>> So bottom line taking in consideration that having mysql replication > would not be an issue. Is one or other preferred? And if yes what would be > the reasons? > >>>> > >>>> Peter > >>>> > >>>>> On 14 Apr 2015, at 08:22, Aki Tuomi <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 03:23:04AM +0300, Keresztes Péter-Zoltán > wrote: > >>>>>> Hello, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Can anyone explain me if there is any difference between having a > master-slave replication on authoritative servers and simple NATIVE servers > with backend replication? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> regards, > >>>>>> Peter > >>>>> > >>>>> The biggest differences are that with master-slave you do not need > anything but > >>>>> tcp/53 and udp/53 open between the servers (both ways), it can > interoperate > >>>>> with other DNS server products. There is no transport security > implied other > >>>>> than provided by TSIG. You also need to do serial number management > to cause > >>>>> transfers. > >>>>> > >>>>> Native replication is backend-specific and all limitations and > benefits are > >>>>> of the backend in question. F.ex. if you use mysql replication, you > get near > >>>>> instant changes in your slaves. No serial number management is > required. > >>>>> > >>>>> Aki > >>>>> > >>>>>> Pdns-users mailing list > >>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>> http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Pdns-users mailing list > >>>> [email protected] > >>>> http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Pdns-users mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pdns-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users > > _______________________________________________ > Pdns-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users >
_______________________________________________ Pdns-users mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
