Yes, I realized this about five minutes after sending my original email. So, how “experimental” is this still in 3.4.6? Is it fairly safe to use in a non-critical setup (the server IS serving other critical records, but the dynamic DNS need itself is non-critical)?
Other than this setting name dropping the “experimental-” in 4.0, are any breaking changes being made to it dynamic DNS support in 4.0? Thanks, Nick On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Pieter Lexis <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Nick, > > On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 13:37:39 -0600 > Nick Williams <[email protected]> wrote: > > > # pdns_server --monitor > > Jan 24 13:35:08 Reading random entropy from '/dev/urandom' > > Jan 24 13:35:08 Loading '/usr/lib64/pdns/libgmysqlbackend.so' > > Jan 24 13:35:08 This is a standalone pdns > > Jan 24 13:35:08 Listening on controlsocket in > '/run/pdns/pdns.controlsocket' > > Jan 24 13:35:08 Fatal error: Trying to set unknown parameter ‘dnsupdate' > > > > Why is dnsupdate an unknown parameter in 3.4.6? Supported was > (allegedly) added in 3.4.0. > > Before 4.0-alpha1 this option was known as `experimental-dnsupdate`[1]. > > Cheers, > > Pieter > > 1 - > https://doc.powerdns.com/3/authoritative/settings/#experimental-dnsupdate > -- > Pieter Lexis > PowerDNS.COM BV -- https://www.powerdns.com > _______________________________________________ > Pdns-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman.powerdns.com/listinfo/[email protected] >
_______________________________________________ Pdns-users mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.powerdns.com/listinfo/[email protected]
