Sorry. I meant the authoritative nameserver did respond with the correct answer.
Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 1, 2017, at 11:21 PM, bert hubert <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 05:52:26AM +0000, Shawn Zhou wrote: >> Hi, >> I am trying out pdns recursor 4.0.6 on Ubuntu Xenial and cache lookup for >> same record with and without client subnet give me the same result which is >> not expected. I expect [3] to return a different value as the cache should >> have different value based on client subnet. I wonder if that's bug with >> edns-client-subnet implementation with pdns or I miss something in the >> configuration file. >> Also, I noticed dig doesn't show "CLIENT-SUBNET: 52.57.28.138/32/16" when I >> dig against pdns but I get that when I dig it against the authoritative >> directly. see [4]. > > Hi Shawn, > > We did a lot of work on EDNS Client Subnet in 4.1, for which a trial release > can be found in > https://blog.powerdns.com/2017/07/18/powerdns-recursor-4-1-0-alpha1-released/ > > Before we analyse your issue to deeply, can you check what 4.1 does in your > case? > > Have you set use-incoming-edns-subnet? > > Good luck! > > Bert _______________________________________________ Pdns-users mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
