Guy Lee <g...@enroute.net> wrote: > > Sometimes the slaves request the AXFR from Master2 instead of Master1 who > sent the NOTIFY. Except that Master2 hasn't updated itself yet and doesn't > have the updated serial, so there's nothing to update on the slaves. > > Is there any way to ensure the AXFR is directed at the supermaster who sent > the NOTIFY?
This sounds like a bug. Your situation is covered in RFC 1996 (DNS NOTIFY) section 3.11 https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1996#page-4 which says the secondary server should do what you suggest. (Tho the description there of what RFC 1035 says doesn't match my reading: I think it should refer to RFC 1034, and that only talks about a single primary. RFC 5936 doesn't clarify this part of the protocol.) Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ champion the freedom, dignity, and well-being of individuals _______________________________________________ Pdns-users mailing list Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com https://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
