Debian will do something similar, unless you've built your own kernel. Then it's up to you to update/patch...
Sean On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 18:58, Bill Spears wrote: > On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 14:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Carla Schroder writes: > > > > > I'm so confused. :) And feeling like a bit of a dunce, after all these years > > > of using Linux. How do distributions handle applying kernel security patches? > > > Like Debian and Red Hat? None of my machines have kernel sources. I use > > > up2date on Red Hat boxes, and of course have the usual security sources in my > > > Debian sources.list. So are my kernels getting updated or not? > > > > > > > I believe that it greatly depends upon the versions which you're updating > > and how your preferences are set. > > > > I believe, and this is after much head scratching, that by default up2date > > on Redhat versions I've used (7.3 and older) will *not* update your kernel, > > even if it does download the kernel rpms. I have no experience with Debian. > > > > Some quick googling on the subject yielded: > > > > http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?threadid=194098 > > http://www.redhat.com/support/resources/howto/kernel-upgrade/ > > > > Hope this is helpful. > > > In Fedora, it installs the new kernel, makes it the default boot option > in grub, but leaves all the old ones as boot options in grub. I seem to > remember red hat doing the same. -- Sean Whitney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ PDXLUG mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pdxlug.org/mailman/listinfo/pdxlug
