On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 11:15, Scott Burch wrote: > I have run FC1 and FC2. FC2 is unstable. FC1 has been perfectly > stable. I use FC1 every day on my servers and workstations. > > With my customers, I still install FC1. That would be my advise to > anyone. Wait for FC3 and see what happens. FC2 was their first attempt > at the 2.6 kernel and they are still working out the bugs. > > Scott
I am running FC2 on 4 machines at home as desktops and dev boxes. My main server in a colo is running FC1. As a desktop, FC2 has been much more responsive..as a server, I don't really notice any differences. I have had a few weird bugs with sound, but thats related to me having 3 sound cards in my machine and not taking the time to figure out how to fix the issue. FC2 + the apt pkg from APT and a bunch of cool repositories, it's a pretty nice distro...imho. -Robby -- Robby Russell | Owner.Developer.Geek PLANET ARGON | www.planetargon.com Portland, OR | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 503.351.4730 | blog.planetargon.com _______________________________________________ PDXLUG mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pdxlug.org/mailman/listinfo/pdxlug
