On Fri, Nov 18, 2005, Caleb Phillips wrote: > That said, I'm not sure I agree that it is broken. While it could > certainly be improved in the way of efficiency (and possibly > robustness), it does do what it is supposed to do. (Unless it changed > since I last hacked on it).
Oh yeah, and and and. It doesn't appear to support atom. There are a few errors on feeds, at least one of which is called atom.xml. I believe that typo defaults to atom now so support might be a good idea. Don't know how hard that will be to add, though. That's probably a wish-list feature for now, though. It works okay at the moment, just no atom support :) Ben _______________________________________________ PdxRuby-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pdxruby.org/mailman/listinfo/pdxruby-dev
