On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 10:01 -0800, Aaron Huslage wrote:
> FastCGI works the same under either web server, so I see no reason to
> pass FCGI traffic through Apache, then through Lighttpd, then to FCGI
> and back again. It's added complexity than is unnecessary, IMHO.
> 
> Webrick is another story...Instiki is broken I think, or rather the
> use of it is wrong. Instiki wasn't really meant for anything more than
> a local service, so Webrick is more than sufficient. If you want a
> solution to that, try i2 or some other wiki engine.
> 
> In a shared environment, why not just give a user an Apache config of
> their own that is included in the main site's config? That's what I've
> always done.
> 

Because our users want *us* to make it work. We take that extra step and
make sure we get it right so you don't have to. :-)

> I see ProxyPass as useful if you are trying to centralize access to
> many services on several (or one) boxes, and I suppose a case could be
> made for using it at PA. It just seems to me that it's quite a lot of
> hoops to jump through from a debugging perspective. Why not just bind
> apache to one IP and Light to another in this case, for instance?
> 

Not really. We have a specific system that we use and not everyone wants
to bother with using Lighttpd. Some use Apache... but some want a speed
increase and don't mind hacking on a lighttpd.conf file. With us... when
you make the move to lighttpd, you take on more responsibility. Apache
isn't sexy enough (anymore) for people to want to take on that
responsibility.

-Robby


-- 
/******************************************************
* Robby Russell, Founder.Developer.Geek
* PLANET ARGON, Rails Development, Consulting & Hosting
* Portland, Oregon  | p: 503.351.4730 | f: 815.642.4068
* www.planetargon.com | www.robbyonrails.com
* Programming Rails   | www.programmingrails.com
*******************************************************/

_______________________________________________
PDXRuby mailing list
[email protected]
IRC: #pdx.rb on irc.freenode.net
http://lists.pdxruby.org/mailman/listinfo/pdxruby

Reply via email to