Info about subscribing or unsubscribing from this list is at the bottom of this 
message.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

see also:

http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2012

The Emperor's New Hump:
The New York Times killed a story that could have changed the election
--because it could have changed the election.

----------

http://www.freepress.org/departments/display/19/2005/1138

Ohio Attorney-General's attack on election protection attorneys draws
mountain of documentation on state's stolen election, including new study
on exit polls
by Steve Rosenfeld and Harvey Wasserman
February 3, 2005

Stiff legal sanctions sought by Ohio's Republican Attorney General James
Petro against four attorneys who have questioned the results of the 2004
presidential balloting here has produced an unintended consequence -- a
massive counter-filing that has put on the official record a mountain of
contentions by those who argue that election was stolen.

In filings that include well over 1,000 pages of critical documentation,
attorneys Robert Fitrakis, Susan Truitt, Peter Peckarsky and Cliff
Arnebeck have counter-attacked. Their defense motions include renewed
assertions that widespread irregularities threw the true outcome of the
November vote count into serious doubt. That assertion has now been lent
important backing by a major academic study on the exit polls that showed
John Kerry winning the November vote count.

Petro's suit is widely viewed as an attempt at revenge and intimidation
against the grassroots movement that led to the first Congressional
challenge to a state's Electoral College delegation since 1876. The
attorney general's action was officially requested by Secretary of State
J. Kenneth Blackwell, who administered the Ohio presidential balloting
while serving as co-chair of the state's Bush-Cheney campaign. Petro and
Blackwell have labeled as "frivolous" the election challenge filing. Their
demand for sanctions will be reviewed by the Republican justice of the
Ohio Supreme Court.

Though Petro's filing was aimed at backing down further challenges to the
Ohio vote, it has allowed the election protection attorneys to enter into
the official archives critical documentation detailing dozens of problems
with Ohio's presidential balloting. Among the documents now made part of
Ohio's legal archives is a congressional investigation report from Rep.
John Conyers that seriously questions the November 2 outcome.

The two now-infamous lawsuits in question, Moss v. Bush and Moss v. Moyer,
argued that irregularities involving enough votes to switch the state's
electors from Bush to Kerry, and from Supreme Court justice Tom Moyer to
challenger Ellen Connally, gave the public the right to file suit.
Underlying much of the challenge have been wide ranging questions about
whether Blackwell administered the election in a partisan manner.

Blackwell refused to testify in the case, and he has removed from public
access critical documents relating to the vote count.

Under Ohio law, an original action to contest election allows only
deposition testimony. It was impossible during the ten days of discovery
to take the depositions of tens of thousands of disenfranchised voters,
the majority African-American. But, as a result of Petro�s sanctions
motion, the attorneys were able to enter into evidence (as Exhibits 1 & 2)
explosive first-hand sworn testimony from November 13 and 15 public
hearings in Columbus about voting irregularities. Excerpts from these
first-person accounts were published on the House Judiciary Committee
Democrats webpage and were used by some three-dozen U.S. Representatives
and Senators to challenge Ohio�s Electoral College certification in
Congress on January 6.

That historic challenge and ensuing national debate deeply embarrassed
Ohio's Republican establishment. Blackwell was explicitly criticized on
the floor of Congress for partisan behavior in administering the election.
In return, Blackwell -- who is running for governor -- has issued personal
attacks against the election protection attorneys who filed the Moss
lawsuits, at one point referring to Fitrakis in public as "a complete
idiot."

In documents filed with the Ohio Supreme Court, Petro�s office charges
that the citizen contestors � Ohio voters - and their attorneys lacked
evidence and proceeded in bad faith to file the challenge. Petro says the
election challenge was a "political nuisance" lawsuit, and as such, the
legal team should be fined -- personally -- many thousands of dollars.

As the sanctions motion moves toward a hearing before Ohio�s Supreme
Court, hundreds of sworn statements are now permanently in the public
record, documenting the massive voting problems which led to Bush's
contested win in Ohio.

Equally significant, the attorneys were able to place into the court
record the 102-page Status Report of the House Judiciary Democratic Staff
entitled "What Went Wrong in Ohio?" Spearheaded by Rep. John Conyers
(D-MI) the report concludes, "We have found numerous, serious election
irregularities in the Ohio presidential election which resulted in a
significant disenfranchisement of voters. Cumulatively, these
irregularities, which affected hundreds of thousands of votes and voters
in Ohio, raise grave doubts whether it can be said the Ohio electors
selected on December 13, 2004 were chosen in a manner that conforms to
Ohio law, let alone federal requirements and constitutional standards."

A motion was also filed asking the court to allow an amicus curiae brief
from Rep. Conyers in support of the contesters counsel. Fitrakis, Truitt,
Peckarsky and Arnebeck have entered affidavits swearing that they had
proceeded in good faith in contesting the election.

Also entered into evidence was a letter dated December 23, 2004 from
Peckarsky to John Zucker, Senior Vice President for Law and Regulation at
ABC that outlined an agreement to "maintain intact Mitofsky's exit poll
data" and that it "not be altered or destroyed"; and a letter from Truitt
dated December 27, 2004 confirming a telephone conversation, with Richard
Coglianese, Ohio Assistant Attorney General, "to the effect that
regardless of the need for the deposition and regardless of the amount of
notice provided (whether days or months) you will not allow the deposition
of your client, J. Kenneth Blackwell, the co-chair of the Bush-Cheney
campaign in Ohio, to occur at any time for any reason."

Arnebeck filed a separate memorandum opposing the sanctions that began:
"The Attorney General's motion for sanctions is false and defamatory. It
appears to be submitted for the partisan purpose of attempting to
discredit those who brought the challenge . . ." Arnebeck told the court
that the Attorney General filed the sanctions motion for intimidation
purposes and it was aimed at public interest attorneys.

"In this instance the Attorney General of the State of Ohio may
unwittingly have placed himself in a position of obstructing justice
rather than upholding it through the filing of this partisan motion, which
is lacking merit and is intended to terminate the search for truth and
accountability in an election of profound importance to the citizens of
Ohio, the United States and the world," Arnebeck concluded.

Fitrakis, who also holds a Ph.D. in political science and served as an
international observer in the 1994 elections in El Salvador and
co-authored and edited the international observer's report to the United
Nations, charged that Petro's actions should be regarded as "an act of
political retaliation and state repression." In the affidavit he also
states that the "Ohio elections fail basic standards of transparency"
under international law.

In the meantime, a high-powered team of researchers concluded "the many
anecdotal reports of voting irregularities create a context in which the
possibility that the overall vote count was substantially corrupted must
be taken seriously. The hypothesis that the discrepancy between the exit
polls and election results is due to errors in the official election tally
is a coherent theory."

The report comes from USCountVotes, which convened ten mathematicians,
statisticians and other researchers to evaluate recent assertions by
Warren Mitofsky and other pollsters that the November 2 exit polling may
have been wrong. Among the assertions by the pollsters is that more
Republicans than Democrats may have refused to be polled after casting
their ballots.

But the USCountVotes study points out that the numbers of voters polls in
Republican precincts was actually higher than in Democratic ones. Mitofsky
and others have said the disparities between their exit polls and the
final outcome were "most likely due to Kerry voters participating in the
exit polls at a higher rate than Bush voters." But, says the USCountVotes
study, "no evidence is offered to support this conclusion. In fact, data
newly released in the report suggests that Bush supporters might have been
OVERREPRESENTED in the exit polls, widening the disparity to be
explained."

The report adds that no data in the pollster's report "supports the
hypothesis that Kerry voters were more likely than Bush voters to
cooperate with pollsters, and the data suggests that the opposite may have
been true."

Should Ohio's Republican-dominated Supreme Court decide to take revenge on
the four election protection attorneys, it will have a mountain of data to
disregard. But whatever the decision, that mountain of assertions about
who really won Ohio and thus the presidency is now a part of the state's
permanent legal landscape.

--

Steve Rosenfeld and Harvey Wasserman are co-authors, with Bob Fitrakis, of
OHIO'S STOLEN ELECTION: VOICES OF THE DISENFRANCHISED, 2004, a book/film
project from www.freepress.org. Contributions are welcome at
www.freepress.org and via the Columbus Institute for Contemporary
Journalism, 1240 Bryden Road, Columbus, OH 43205.

_____________________________

Note: This message comes from the peace-justice-news e-mail mailing list of 
articles and commentaries about peace and social justice issues, activism, etc. 
 If you do not regularly receive mailings from this list or have received this 
message as a forward from someone else and would like to be added to the list, 
send a blank e-mail with the subject "subscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
or you can visit:
http://lists.enabled.com/mailman/listinfo/peace-justice-news  Go to that same 
web address to view the list's archives or to unsubscribe.

E-mail accounts that become full, inactive or out of order for more than a few 
days will be deleted from this list.

FAIR USE NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the 
information in this e-mail is distributed without profit to those who have 
expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational 
purposes.  I am making such material available in an effort to advance 
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, 
scientific, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair 
use' of copyrighted material as provided for in the US Copyright Law.

Reply via email to