Info about subscribing or unsubscribing from this list is at the bottom of this 
message.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7037619/site/newsweek/

Newsweek
March 2005 Issue

Terror: A Tangled Web
He's accused of plotting to assassinate Bush. But even some Feds think the
government won't win.
                By Michael Isikoff

The confession came quickly, and it sounded damning. After a few days of
allegedly rough interrogation, Ahmed Omar Abu Ali�a soft-spoken
high-school valedictorian from the Washington, D.C., suburbs�either
cracked or simply told his questioners what they wanted to hear. While
studying in the holy city of Medina, Saudi Arabia, Abu Ali said, he had
met with a Qaeda operative and offered to set up a sleeper cell in the
United States to organize terror attacks. He wanted to be like September
11 ringleader Muhammad Atta, Abu Ali added in his confession. The young
Muslim American even talked about an assassination plot. The purported
target: President George W. Bush. Abu Ali allegedly suggested that Bush
could either be shot on the street or blown up in a car-bomb attack.

An open-and-shut case, you might think. The problem with this Perry Mason
moment, however, is that it occurred in a Saudi Arabian prison, where no
U.S. officials were present and where, according to human-rights groups,
suspects are often physically abused. One of Abu Ali's lawyers, Edward
MacMahon, said after the suspect's first court hearing last week that he
personally saw "multiple scars" all over Abu Ali's back, looking "exactly
like somebody who has been whipped." Prosecutors deny this, but even U.S.
law-enforcement officials admit there is a good chance Abu Ali could
eventually walk out of prison a free man. The indictment of Abu Ali shows
how the administration's aggressive pursuit of the global war on terror is
increasingly getting tangled up in legal constraints at home.

Government officials are acutely aware of these problems�which is one
reason Abu Ali's nearly two-year-old criminal case remained unaddressed in
U.S. courts until last week. NEWSWEEK has learned that his confession,
which occurred shortly after his arrest in June 2003, was videotaped by
the Saudis and immediately turned over to the FBI. The tape became the
chief piece of evidence against him. But back in Washington, the case
presented an agonizing dilemma for top Justice Department officials,
sources said.

After searching his home in Falls Church, Va., and finding seemingly
incriminating documents (including a screed by Osama bin Laden's deputy
Ayman al-Zawahiri), federal agents became convinced that Abu Ali was
indeed "a really bad guy," as one put it. Yet even the top aides to the
then Attorney General John Ashcroft didn't think they had anything
resembling a solid criminal case. There was no indication the alleged Bush
assassination plot ever advanced beyond the talking phase. No FBI agents
were there when Abu Ali made his self-incriminating confession. If the
Saudis sent Abu Ali home�as they kept offering to do�Justice officials
fretted the videotape would likely get tossed out of court, and Abu Ali
would walk. "We didn't know what to do with this guy," one former Justice
official confided to NEWSWEEK.

So for the next 20 months, Justice let Abu Ali, a U.S. citizen, languish
in a Saudi jail cell. He had no access to a lawyer, and no charges were
filed against him. Critics say this is a prime example of how the Bush
administration has "outsourced" the detention of terror suspects to
cooperative Mideast countries with poor human-rights records. But Abu
Ali's Virginia-based parents�his father works as a computer analyst for
the Saudi Embassy�say their son was tortured into confessing to lies, and
sued the federal government last year. The judge in the civil case, John
Bates, grew impatient. Bates threatened to force Justice officials to
explain under oath what they knew about Abu Ali's detention. So the
department arranged to charge Abu Ali back in the United States with
providing material support to terrorists.

The chief federal prosecutor in the case, Paul McNulty, asserted last week
that the 23-year-old Houston-born Abu Ali had "turned his back on America
and joined the cause of Al Qaeda." But inside Justice, many are still
deeply uneasy. "I was amazed they did this," one veteran official said. "I
don't know how [the prosecution] can be done successfully." Another senior
law-enforcement official told NEWSWEEK that Justice was making the best of
a bad situation. Even if the case ultimately collapses, an aggressive
prosecution might be able to delay for years the day when Abu Ali will be
able to "walk free," the official explained.

But is this a legitimate tactic in the war on terror? In the aftermath of
September 11, the White House had resorted to even more brazen methods: it
declared two other U.S. citizens, Yaser Hamdi and Jose Padilla, "enemy
combatants" and threw them into military brigs without access to lawyers.
But last June the Supreme Court ruled that the war on terror did not give
the president a "blank check" to dispense with core constitutional rights.
(Hamdi was released last fall.) The case against Abu Ali, legal experts
say, could present even more daunting challenges.

The torture charge is an especially awkward one for the new Attorney
General Alberto Gonzales, who once reviewed alleged torture techniques in
meetings at the White House. Under U.S. law, police brutality�or any hint
of a coerced confession�is often ground for dismissal.

U.S. prosecutors insist that Abu Ali was examined by doctors and there
were no signs of abuse. But a source close to the Saudi security forces
told NEWSWEEK that the interrogations of Abu Ali had indeed been
aggressive. "He definitely got slapped around," the source said. "But he
was not tortured." Prosecutors will also have to explain how a man
described as unfailingly polite became ensnared by terrorists. Abu Ali's
family proudly notes that he graduated at the top of his class at the
Islamic Saudi Academy outside Washington. But critics like Sen. Chuck
Schumer accuse the school�which is funded by the Saudi Embassy�of teaching
an intolerant brand of Islam that can breed sympathy for terrorist causes.
Prosecutors also say Abu Ali was friendly with some members of a group of
Islamic extremists who practiced paramilitary games in the Virginia woods,
and sold one of them a rifle.

According to last week's indictment, one of the supposedly incriminating
items found in the June 2003 search of his home was a copy of Handguns
magazine with Abu Ali's name on the subscription label. That's not exactly
a crime, though. One recent issue of Handguns hails President Bush's
success in last year's election as a "Sportsmen's Victory." If prosecutors
want to keep Abu Ali locked up in the long run, they will have to come up
with something more. And if the Bush administration wants to fight a war
that is increasingly becoming a legal morass, it may have to think up some
new tactics.

_____________________________

Note: This message comes from the peace-justice-news e-mail mailing list of 
articles and commentaries about peace and social justice issues, activism, etc. 
 If you do not regularly receive mailings from this list or have received this 
message as a forward from someone else and would like to be added to the list, 
send a blank e-mail with the subject "subscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
or you can visit:
http://lists.enabled.com/mailman/listinfo/peace-justice-news  Go to that same 
web address to view the list's archives or to unsubscribe.

E-mail accounts that become full, inactive or out of order for more than a few 
days will be deleted from this list.

FAIR USE NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the 
information in this e-mail is distributed without profit to those who have 
expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational 
purposes.  I am making such material available in an effort to advance 
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, 
scientific, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair 
use' of copyrighted material as provided for in the US Copyright Law.

Reply via email to