Info about subscribing or unsubscribing from this list is at the bottom of this 
message.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://snipurl.com/ddua

The Spoils of War
By MICHAEL SHNAYERSON
Vanity Fair, 7 March 2005

Halliburton subsidiary KBR got $12 billion worth of exclusive contracts
for work in Iraq. But even more shocking is how KBR spent some of the
money. Former U.S. Army Corps of Engineers official Bunnatine Greenhouse
is blowing the whistle on the Dick Cheney�linked company's profits of war


This time, she was sure, they were going to get her.

Bunnatine Greenhouse had been a huge nuisance since the buildup to the war
in Iraq�questioning contracts, writing caveats on them in her spidery
script, wanting to know why Halliburton and its subsidiary KBR (formerly
known as Kellogg, Brown and Root) should be thrown billions of dollars of
government business while other companies, big and small, were shut out.

And Bunny Greenhouse wasn't that easy to ignore: she was the
highest-ranking civilian at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE).
Specifically, she was the officer in charge of ensuring that any work
contracted out by the Army Corps to private industry�from help in building
bridges and dams and highways to support for wartime troops�was granted in
a fair and aboveboard way. For two years, Greenhouse had asked hard
questions about why the head of the Corps, to whom she reported directly,
kept giving exclusive, non-compete contracts to KBR that now amounted to
roughly $10.8 billion. Greenhouse was fearless, and she was blunt. In the
Corps's male hierarchy, it probably didn't help that she was a woman�or
that she was black.

On October 6, 2004, Greenhouse was summoned by the Corps's deputy
commander, Major General Robert Griffin. She knew that the top brass was
eager to finalize the Corps's latest contract for KBR, a $75 million
extension for troop support in the Balkans. Already it had gone through
several drafts, mostly because Greenhouse kept questioning the rationale
for giving it to KBR without competitive bidding. What she didn't know was
that her superiors had closed ranks against her.

When Greenhouse entered the general's office, he handed her a letter that
explained she was being demoted for poor performance�a curious indictment,
given that she'd received high performance ratings before the war. The
demotion would knock her down to the government rank of GS-15. That was
like going from senior vice president in a Fortune 500 company to middle
management. She could retire instead with full benefits if she liked, the
letter went on to say. She was, after all, 60.

Greenhouse chose a third alternative: she hired a lawyer and began to fight.

All through last year's searing presidential campaign, the mere mention of
Halliburton stirred fury and bitterness in the blue states. How, Democrats
asked, had the Houston-based oil-and-gas conglomerate won all those deals
to provide services to troops in Iraq? What role had Dick Cheney played
behind the scenes, given that the vice president had been Halliburton's
C.E.O. from 1995 to 2000, walked away from the job with an estimated $35
million, and continues to get six-figure deferred-salary compensation from
the company, despite his denials that he does? True, Halliburton's $12.5
billion division KBR had expanded over the years from oil and gas to do
lots of government work: about half of its 60,000 employees in 43
countries handle military needs, from building bases to serving food. But
other companies�Fluor for one, Parsons for another�service the military,
too. Why hadn't they been considered?

Worse, KBR appeared to have mismanaged the work it got. At various
hearings of the House Committee on Government Reform last year, ranking
minority member Henry Waxman (a Democrat from California) turned livid as
he detailed charges of reckless spending, chaos in the distribution of
supplies, and profiteering by KBR executives�charges less often refuted
than shrugged off.

Waxman had gotten many of his talking points from a plucky group of
whistle-blowers: contract staffers and truckdrivers who'd worked for KBR
in Iraq. Their view was from the ground, with startling allegations of how
KBR operated�and operates still�on a day-to-day basis in the war zone.

Greenhouse, though, is the first to offer that view from a top-down
perspective. The picture that emerges when her account is added to the
others is of a company much like the law practice in John Grisham's novel
The Firm: a rogue operation, with corrupt management, cynically conning
the federal government as it rakes in billions of ill-earned taxpayer
dollars.

Greenhouse knows how KBR got those contracts in the first place. She also
thinks she knows why.


Not surprisingly, Greenhouse is a bit late one evening in Washington when
she bustles into the offices of her lawyer, Michael Kohn, with an armload
of documents. She's still at her job, having invoked protection under the
whistle-blower law of 1989, which keeps federal employees from being fired
or demoted until an investigation is conducted. Between doing her job and
preparing her case, she's got a lot to juggle.

Broad-shouldered and ebullient, Greenhouse radiates the conviction of her
faith as a charismatic Catholic. She's sung in a Sunday church choir her
whole adult life, and it's easy to imagine her there: she's the one in the
back row with the booming voice. "Back in 1970, God impressed upon me that
I was to be a fisher of men," she declares. "I didn't know what that
meant. But now it's all falling together. Something good is going to come
out of this. And more people who are lost right now are going to come into
His fold."

Greenhouse has an up-by-the-bootstraps, all-American story. She was raised
in the segregated cotton town of Rayville, Louisiana. Her father never
made it to third grade. But he operated the steam compress in the middle
of town that turned picked cotton bolls into bales, so he was, as his
daughter recalls, an important figure in the community. He and his wife, a
fervent Bible reader, urged their six children to strive for excellence,
and that they did. Most earned advanced degrees. Bunny was valedictorian
at Baton Rouge's Southern University and went on to acquire three master's
degrees, all related to her work at the Corps. One of her brothers chose
to excel in basketball. No one who follows the game has forgotten the
Washington Bullets' and Houston Rockets' Hall of Famer, Elvin Hayes.

In 1965, Bunny married her college sweetheart, and when Aloysius
Greenhouse became an army procurement officer�overseeing the purchase of
supplies and services�she followed him on postings around the country and
in Europe, teaching high-school and college math as she went. The only
time they were apart was when her husband went to Vietnam, serving in the
infantry�two tours, Silver Star. Eventually, Bunny went into procurement
herself, for both government and industry. In 1997, General Joe Ballard,
the Army Corps's first black chief engineer, brought Greenhouse in as the
Corps's top procurement officer. He wanted her to shatter the cronyism
that had led to bad contracts, and so she did.

At the Corps, as at other government agencies, senior officers often leave
for cushy jobs with the very companies they negotiated with on the
government's behalf. Especially the biggest ones, such as Halliburton and
Parsons. Greenhouse's mission was to be sure some of the pie was saved for
small and minority-owned businesses. That wasn't just policy�it was the
law. Greenhouse had to sign off on every contract valued at more than $10
million. On no less than 50 of the documents she signed, she added clauses
and conditions to make sure the law was upheld. There was grumbling from
the start, and after Ballard, her mentor, left in 2000, she says,
underlings started chopping big contracts into parts worth less than $10
million to try to evade her scrutiny. She could deal with that. But then
came the war in Iraq, with its promise of glittering profits. And suddenly
everything changed.


"The meeting was in the Pentagon�one of those really secure rooms,"
Greenhouse recalls. The date was February 26, 2003, three weeks before the
Iraq invasion. The Army Corps's Lieutenant General Carl A. Strock was
there; Greenhouse says he was the one who would lead the campaign to ax
her 20 months later. There, too, were representatives from Defense, State,
USAID and others, several dozen in all. A major item on the agenda was
deciding which outside contractor would get the multi-billion-dollar job
of putting out the oil-well fires that Saddam Hussein's troops would
presumably set once the invasion began, and then getting the wells
operating again. The project was to be known as RIO, for Restore Iraqi
Oil.

Several U.S. companies had the know-how. Texas-based GSM Consulting, for
one, had done such work in the wake of the Gulf War. Yet the assumption in
the room was that KBR had the job�an assumption underscored by the
extraordinary presence of KBR representatives at the high-level government
meeting. "They came in late�it was a snow day," Greenhouse recalls. "I was
just flabbergasted."

Greenhouse knew that the previous fall KBR had been paid $1.9 million to
draft a contingency plan for how RIO should unfold. But that was reason
enough not to let KBR do RIO. It was strict protocol in the procurement
business that the contractor who drew up the contingency plan for a job
should not be allowed to bid on the job itself: he'd know the exact budget
and other details that would give him an unfair advantage. Yet here was
KBR sliding into the job without an eyebrow raised�precisely because, as
the participants at the meeting agreed, it was the only company that met
the criteria outlined in its own contingency plan! To Greenhouse's greater
shock, the senior officers and the KBR representatives around the table
spoke of a sole-source, non-compete contract that could last five years.
In the first of many detailed responses to Vanity Fair, KBR notes that the
Government Accountability Office (G.A.O.) concluded that the RIO contract
was "properly awarded." But the G.A.O. also concluded that the $1.9
million contingency plan on which RIO was based was improperly awarded.


Worst of all, the contract would be "cost-plus": KBR would just submit
bills for whatever it spent, and the government would reimburse it, adding
fees of between 2 and 7 percent as KBR's profit. It didn't take a genius
to see that the more money KBR spent, the more profit it would make. KBR
says that its award fee of up to 5 percent on RIO is based in large part
on its ability to control costs. But the G.A.O. has concluded that KBR let
costs spiral out of control.

Incensed, Greenhouse went over to whisper in Lieutenant General Strock's
ear that the KBR people had to leave the room. The general complied with
her request, but seemed adamant that KBR get the job on the grounds of
"compelling emergency." All Greenhouse could do was insist that the
contract be limited to a year.

The next day, the final contract was submitted to Greenhouse for her
approval. The basic terms�five years, non-compete, cost-plus�remained.
Greenhouse signed�the country was, after all, on the eve of war�but only
after writing, "I caution that extending this sole source effort beyond a
one year period could convey an invalid perception that there is not
strong intent for a limited competition." (In light of the pending
investigation into Greenhouse's charges, the Army Corps declined to
comment on any details of her case.)

To KBR, the contract was potentially worth $7 billion�just the start of
its business from the war in Iraq.

There were signs, though no proof, that Vice President Cheney, or someone
in his office, had played a part in tipping RIO to KBR. Certainly, his
office had been informed of the decision to award the RIO contingency plan
to KBR. Michael Mobbs, a political appointee who reported to
Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Doug Feith, acknowledged to
Congressman Waxman's staff that he had relayed the news that KBR would
prepare the RIO plan to various White House officials in an October 2002
meeting. One of those officials was I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Cheney's
chief of staff. (A Cheney spokesman, Kevin Kellems, subsequently told The
Washington Post that Libby had kept Cheney out of the loop about the
decision to use KBR for the plan.) And Time would unearth an Army Corps
e-mail stating that the contingency plan had been "coordinated" with the
vice president's office. As The Wall Street Journal reported, Halliburton
executives then met directly with Cheney's staff. KBR, for its part, says
the vice president had nothing to do with any of its Iraq contracts.

Greenhouse herself saw another dynamic was at work. "I think what this was
all about was that Rumsfeld had made very negative statements about the
Corps," she says. Rumsfeld saw the Corps as a bunch of geeky engineers,
mostly tinkering with public works in the U.S. He'd actually raised the
idea of sliding the Corps over to the Interior Department, which oversees
all federally owned lands. That was anathema to the Corps, in name and
tradition an integral part of the U.S. Army. So Lieutenant General Robert
B. Flowers, at that time the Corps's chief engineer, made it his goal to
show Rumsfeld what the Corps could do. "He was pushing everything that he
could to get the Corps in the limelight," Greenhouse says. So eager was
he, Greenhouse believes, that Rumsfeld saw Flowers could be used.

Ordinarily, the Department of Defense would have coordinated the RIO
contract. But Rumsfeld, Greenhouse theorizes, wanted to put some political
distance between Defense and a sole-source contract for KBR that could
prove embarrassing, even as it pleased the White House. So the Corps was
willing to be used as the vehicle to push this through and have
Halliburton get the $7 billion contract.

The Corps, Greenhouse thought, would take the heat for giving RIO to KBR,
and in the process play a larger role in Iraq. With any luck, it would
show Rumsfeld it was worthy of remaining in the U.S. Army. A Defense
spokesman calls the theory far-fetched. "The Secretary of Defense can't do
that on his own. Congress would have to be involved, the president would
be involved, it would be a decision by the administration."


To everyone's surprise, the Iraqi oil fields sustained hardly any damage,
from either U.S. bombs or Saddam's troops, in the "shock and awe" invasion
of March 2003. So there wasn't much RIO for KBR to do. Gamely, the company
suggested it change its job to handling Iraq's immediate fuel needs:
bringing in truckloads of gasoline from Kuwait for military and civilians
alike. That was fine with the Corps.

The other surprise was that U.S. troops couldn't just leave the country
they'd conquered. They had to stay, and be housed and fed. That meant a
lot more work for KBR, which already had a lucrative contract for troop
support in the Balkans�a type of contract known by the awkward acronym of
LOGCAP�and had persuaded the Corps to draw up a similar one for Iraq.
Marie deYoung, one of the whistle-blowers who would later cooperate with
Congressman Waxman, came to believe soon after her arrival in Kuwait as a
logistics specialist for KBR, in December 2003, that LOGCAP had an almost
built-in potential for chaos, abuse, and graft.


Dark-haired and lively, deYoung seems far younger than her 50 years,
talking a blue streak as she sketches a life that's taken her from
orchestral conducting to social work for the U.S. Army to the seminary and
back to the army again, with time out to write or co-write two books (This
Woman's Army and Women in Combat) and be a television and radio
commentator on social issues in the military. Thorough and seemingly
tireless, she promises to follow up on a first interview by sending
documents by e-mail. By day's end, she's sent 24 e-mails, with documents
attached to each one.

DeYoung hadn't intended to go to Kuwait at all. She had signed on for
Kosovo, where KBR needed lots of procurement help, too. There for three
months, she got an up-close look at KBR's model in action. This was the
way the new, outsourced army was supposed to work. In the aftermath of
ethnic cleansing, when order had been restored to the Balkans, KBR had won
its first LOGCAP contract: it would supply everything that occupying U.S.
forces needed, from tents and mess halls to swimming pools and generators.
The federal government would be trimmed, private industry would profit,
soldiers would be snappily serviced. The original architect of this plan
was Dick Cheney, then assistant secretary of defense under President
George H. W. Bush. LOGCAP was a huge boon to KBR and its parent,
Halliburton. Just four years later, Cheney was Halliburton's C.E.O.

In Kosovo, deYoung saw, the plan had worked�up to a point. KBR had fixed
war-torn cities in record time. It had employed local vendors, who
acquired new expertise. To newcomers, KBR liked to show a documentary of
the work it had done in the Balkans. It made for stirring footage,
especially with the theme song of its booming soundtrack, "We Built This
City (on Rock and Roll)," by the 80s schlock-rock group Starship.

DeYoung did notice something curious about this Utopian model. Army
commanders came and went every six months or so. What they wanted was some
project they could point to as the pride of their time: a new swimming
pool for the troops, or heated tents. KBR could do that for them. So most
commanders happily signed off on the sort of expensive projects that Bunny
Greenhouse would come to call "gold-plated"�projects that KBR could
cost-plus-bill to the U.S. government. In any event commanders would be
gone soon enough; KBR's employees were the ones who remained. So, as
deYoung observes, "who's in control?"

This was the model that got KBR the big contracts in Iraq. But hiring a
bunch of local Arab vendors in the midst of a war that kept metastasizing
wasn't as easy as building a city on rock 'n' roll.

DeYoung, who earned $8,800 a month "for a 90-hour work week," flew to
Kuwait on December 14, 2003�the day that Saddam Hussein's capture was
announced. She was sent immediately to Camp Udairi, a U.S. military base
near the Iraq border, to update 27 KBR subcontracts for work being done at
the camp. Her first surprise was that most of the contracts had nothing to
do with servicing U.S. troops. They were all about servicing KBR.
"Building houses for itself, building separate gyms and rec centers from
what the army had � " (KBR says that all its work in Kuwait and Iraq is
done at the direction of the U.S. Army.) DeYoung found the 27 subcontracts
in chaos�goods unaccounted for, invoices paid without
documentation�because the KBR staffers who'd drawn them up were
incompetent, she felt. Most had no bookkeeping skills and were there
because of family connections.

By late February, deYoung had begun working in KBR's LOGCAP office at the
elegant Persian Gulf�front Khalifa resort, just outside Kuwait City. There
she oversaw a much larger pile of 519 KBR subcontracts that appeared to
her to be in no better shape than the ones for Camp Udairi. (A company
spokesperson observes that KBR had gone from supporting 25,000 troops at 7
base camps to 211,000 U.S. and coalition troops at more than 60 camps on
very little notice, an extraordinary challenge.)


It was at the LOGCAP office that deYoung saw how well KBR managers in
Kuwait were living. They stayed in expensive waterfront hotels in Kuwait
City and its environs at more than $100 a night per room. They availed
themselves of hotel laundry service, even while KBR was paying outrageous
prices to a subcontractor for laundry. And when they left their hotels,
they didn't carpool or take buses. They'd requisitioned expensive-brand
S.U.V.'s for themselves. DeYoung did some number crunching and came up
with the figure of $73 million a year. That, she concluded, was what KBR
was spending for its top managers in Kuwait City to live so well. More
accurately, that was what U.S. taxpayers were paying�not including the
extra 2-to-3-percent profit that came with the cost-plus system. (KBR says
only a few managers are in off-base housing and that those in hotel rooms
are routinely doubled up. DeYoung says the only people who stayed two to a
room were men with girlfriends, "often the lesser paid Balkans girls.")

What were the KBR managers actually doing there? Not overseeing
construction projects, or kicking the tires of convoy trucks they'd
brought in to supply the troops, or looking at blueprints for new army
bases in Iraq. According to deYoung, they weren't doing any of that. They
were sitting in their hotel rooms, or out on their waterfront balconies,
giving the nod to subcontractors to do all the work. (KBR says it "self
performs" some jobs and subcontracts others.) Once a subcontractor was
hired, the KBR team had no idea whether goods or services were delivered,
deYoung asserts. The team just paid whatever invoices the subcontractors
submitted, and hoped for the best. (KBR calls this a "ridiculous claim"
and says that all goods and services must be verified before invoices are
paid. DeYoung says that's simply not true, and e-mails a blizzard of
documents from her time in Kuwait to support her case.)

continued...

_____________________________

Note: This message comes from the peace-justice-news e-mail mailing list of 
articles and commentaries about peace and social justice issues, activism, etc. 
 If you do not regularly receive mailings from this list or have received this 
message as a forward from someone else and would like to be added to the list, 
send a blank e-mail with the subject "subscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
or you can visit:
http://lists.enabled.com/mailman/listinfo/peace-justice-news  Go to that same 
web address to view the list's archives or to unsubscribe.

E-mail accounts that become full, inactive or out of order for more than a few 
days will be deleted from this list.

FAIR USE NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the 
information in this e-mail is distributed without profit to those who have 
expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational 
purposes.  I am making such material available in an effort to advance 
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, 
scientific, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair 
use' of copyrighted material as provided for in the US Copyright Law.

Reply via email to