Info about subscribing or unsubscribing from this list is at the bottom of this message. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://snipurl.com/dptj 59 Ex-Diplomats Oppose Nominee Rejection of Bolton for U.N. Urged Associated Press Tuesday, March 29, 2005 Challenging the White House, 59 former American diplomats are urging the Senate to reject John R. Bolton's nomination to be the next U.S. ambassador to the United Nations. "He is the wrong man for this position," they said in a letter to Sen. Richard G. Lugar (R-Ind.), chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Lugar has scheduled hearings on Bolton's nomination for April 7. "We urge you to reject that nomination," the former diplomats said in a letter obtained by the Associated Press. The ex-diplomats have served in both Democratic and Republican administrations, some for long terms and others briefly. They include Arthur A. Hartman, ambassador to France and the Soviet Union under presidents Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan and assistant secretary of state for European affairs under President Richard M. Nixon. Others who signed the letter include Princeton N. Lyman, ambassador to South Africa and Nigeria under presidents Reagan, George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton; Monteagle Stearns, ambassador to Greece and Ivory Coast in the Ford, Carter and Reagan administrations; and Spurgeon M. Keeny Jr., deputy director of the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency in the Carter administration. Their criticism dwelled primarily on Bolton's stand on issues as the State Department's senior arms control official. They said he had an "exceptional record" of opposing U.S. efforts to improve national security through arms control. The former diplomats also chided Bolton for his "insistence that the U.N. is valuable only when it directly serves the United States." That view, they said, would not help him negotiate with other diplomats at the United Nations. Adam Ereli, the State Department's deputy spokesman, responded: "He is a great nominee. We hope he will be confirmed. And we look forward to his getting to New York to do the nation's business." ----------------- http://snipurl.com/drao Bolton's Big Secret Ari Berman / The Nation Much has been written about the appointment of unilateralist uber-hawk John Bolton as America's new UN ambassador, but there's been almost nothing regarding Bolton's role in promoting the fantasy that Saddam Hussein (news - web sites) tried to acquire enriched uranium from Niger. In fact, United Press International is the only national news agency or publication thus far to detail Bolton's behind-the-scenes dealings, in a news story by Christian Bourge and a column by Steve Clemons, who's monitored Bolton at his blog The Washington Note. News of Bolton's involvement in the Niger scandal broke on March 1, when Congressman Henry Waxman sent a letter to Chris Shays, chairman of the House Subcommittee on National Security. As part of a larger examination of excessive government secrecy, Waxman wrote that the "State Department concealed classified information about the role of John Bolton, Under Secretary of State for Arms Control, in creation of a fact sheet that falsely claimed that Iraq sought uranium from Niger." According to Waxman, after Bolton repeatedly advanced a known untruth, his staff tried to squelch an investigation and lied to Congress about their boss's role. The State Department drew up the fact sheet in response to the Iraqi regime's weapons declaration to the UN Security Council on December 7, 2002. "The Declaration ignores efforts to procure uranium from Niger," State alleged. "Why is the Iraqi regime hiding their uranium procurement?" At the time, State Department and CIA intelligence experts knew the question's premise was false. When Waxman pressed Colin Powell on whether Bolton was behind the statement, State responded on September 25, 2003 that "John R. Bolton did not play a role in the creation of this document." But a subsequent request for the fact sheet's chronology proved that on December 18, 2002--eight months before the denial--State Department spokesman Richard Boucher asked Bolton "for help developing a response to Iraq's December 7 declaration...that could be used with the press." Bolton agreed and put his staff at the Bureau of Nonproliferation in charge. Three different versions of the fact sheet, all emailed to Bolton, included the debunked Niger charge. The chronology was labeled "sensitive but unclassified" and protected from Freedom of Information Act requests. If not for Waxman's persistence, the truth of Bolton's involvement may never have been exposed. The Bush Administration is rightfully worried about Bolton's confirmation, and the new Niger revelation may be one reason why State unsuccessfully attempted to fast-track public hearings before the Senate recess on March 21. The first hearings of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee will instead commence on April 7. At least one Republican will need to join the Committee's eight Democrats to block Bolton's appointment. The key swing votes are Democrat Russ Feingold (D-WI) and Republican Lincoln Chafee (R-RI). Feingold may run for President in 2008 and has a disturbing history of backing some of the Administration's most controversial nominees (see Ashcroft, John). Chafee faces a tough 2006 re-election challenge in a blue state. Both should have plenty of time to review Bolton's "Affair with Niger" over their spring break. _____________________________ Note: This message comes from the peace-justice-news e-mail mailing list of articles and commentaries about peace and social justice issues, activism, etc. If you do not regularly receive mailings from this list or have received this message as a forward from someone else and would like to be added to the list, send a blank e-mail with the subject "subscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or you can visit: http://lists.enabled.com/mailman/listinfo/peace-justice-news Go to that same web address to view the list's archives or to unsubscribe. E-mail accounts that become full, inactive or out of order for more than a few days will be deleted from this list. FAIR USE NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the information in this e-mail is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. I am making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of copyrighted material as provided for in the US Copyright Law.
