Info about subscribing or unsubscribing from this list is at the bottom of this 
message.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://snipurl.com/eoep

"The Bushes Offer a Horse Jerk-off Joke But No Words for the Troops...and
Other Impolite Observations From the White House Correspondents' Dinner."

by David Corn of The Nation magazine


No mention of the US troops being killed in Iraq but a horse jerk-off
joke--that is one way to sum up the First Couple's appearance at the White
House Correspondents' Dinner on Saturday evening.

This black-tie shindig is an annual ritual. Over two thousand DC media
people and government officials mingle with imported Hollywood
celebrities--hey there goes Richard Gere!--and the president of the moment
shows up and entertains the feeling-good-about-themselves attendees with
humorous (often self-deprecating) remarks. Last year, Bush made a crack
about my book, The Lies of George W. Bush.

This evening, the Bush White House pulled a switcheroo. Bush started his
routine by telling a joke he repeatedly used on the campaign trail. The
gag pokes fun at a city slicker lost in a rural area, and what Bush didn't
say is that he learned it during his unsuccessful 1978 congressional bid
when his opponent told the joke to lampoon a certain Andover, Yale and
Harvard grad who was trying to pass himself off as a Texan. As
Bush-watchers in the ballroom familiar with this stale chestnut started to
groan, Laura Bush stood up, walked to the podium, leaned into the
microphone and said, "Not that old joke." She then told her husband to sit
down, and she delivered a polished routine that ribbed her old man for
being early-to-bed dull. She noted that she had told him, "If you really
want to end tyranny in the world, you're going to have to stay up later."

Laura's well-written script included several shots of risque material.
After revealing that come nine o'clock at night, "Mr. Excitement is sound
asleep, and I'm watching Desperate Housewives," she added, "If those women
think they're desperate, they ought to be with George." She then joked
that she, Lynne Cheney, and Condoleezza Rice had hit Chippendale's late
one night. And moments later--after referring to Barbara Bush as Don
Corleone and joking about her husband's aversion to reading--she made fun
of her number-one cowboy for knowing little of the ways of ranch life when
they bought the spread in Crawford, Texas. Such a greenhorn was George,
she explained, "he tried to milk the horse. What's more--it was a male
horse."

It was a good performance but weird, for Laura had jabbed at her husband
for not reading books, had suggested he was no powerhouse in bed, and had
encouraged everyone in the room--and all those children at home glued to
C-SPAN--to envision George W. Bush pulling on the penis of a horse. (I
wondered how social conservative leader James Dobson, who was scheduled to
be at the dinner, reacted.) It was not hard to figure out why the White
House decided to have Laura upstage George. Her approval rating is almost
twice his, and his number--in the mid-40s--are at a record low. But an HBO
routine? Afterward, both Al Franken and Bill Maher were complaining that
they could not have gotten away with that horse joke.

Laura's racy act was the talk of the town. But there was something more
strange and discomforting about the evening than her channeling of Ellen
DeGeneres. Neither she nor her husband once referred to the Americans
serving in Iraq and Afghanistan, particularly those who had recently lost
their lives implementing Bush's policy and (according to the Bushes)
defending the United States from evil. At a high-profile event of this
nature, it certainly is customary for a president to joke, but he also
often concludes with a serious sentiment. At the radio and television
correspondents' dinner several weeks ago, Vice President Dick Cheney,
standing in for Bush (who was on his way to the Pope's funeral), took a
few stabs at humor then devoted most of his remarks to the deceased Pope.
Last year, at one of these galas, Bush joked about his inability to find
WMDs in Iraq--yeah, he made fun of the mission for which Americans had
lost their lives--but then he saluted troops stationed overseas, noting
their sacrifices.

His--and Laura's--non-recognition of the American troops (those dying and
those doing the real hard work) was not a one-time phenomenon. Two nights
earlier at Bush's first primetime news conference in a year, Bush said
nothing about the Americans risking their lives in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Not a word of thanks. Not a word of tribute for those recently killed in
action. He did mention troop levels and said, "I believe we're making
really good progress in Iraq." But nada regarding the men and women he had
dispatched into harm's way. Is this a pattern? Of course, Bush does not
have to remind people that Americans are being shot to death and blown up
in Iraq and that the violence in Iraq has increased lately. But recent
polls disclose that a half of Americans now believe that Bush deliberately
misled the public about the (nonexistent) WMDs in Iraq and that a slight
majority have concluded that the war was not worth it. With most Americans
down on the war as the insurgents mount more deadly attacks and military
experts in the United States predict this conflict may last for five to 30
years, is Bush consciously not referring directly to the soldiers and,
especially, the fallen Americans? Or has he just forgotten to do so when
he has appeared in public?

_____________________________

Note: This message comes from the peace-justice-news e-mail mailing list of 
articles and commentaries about peace and social justice issues, activism, etc. 
 If you do not regularly receive mailings from this list or have received this 
message as a forward from someone else and would like to be added to the list, 
send a blank e-mail with the subject "subscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
or you can visit:
http://lists.enabled.com/mailman/listinfo/peace-justice-news  Go to that same 
web address to view the list's archives or to unsubscribe.

E-mail accounts that become full, inactive or out of order for more than a few 
days will be deleted from this list.

FAIR USE NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the 
information in this e-mail is distributed without profit to those who have 
expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational 
purposes.  I am making such material available in an effort to advance 
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, 
scientific, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair 
use' of copyrighted material as provided for in the US Copyright Law.

Reply via email to