Info about subscribing or unsubscribing from this list is at the bottom of this 
message.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://snipurl.com/epwn

Japan Times  2 May 2005

U.S. may allow nuke strikes over WMD
    Proposal would reverse 10-year policy

WASHINGTON (Kyodo) The U.S. military is considering allowing regional
combatant commanders to request presidential approval for pre-emptive
nuclear strikes against possible attacks with weapons of mass destruction
on the United States or its allies, according to a draft nuclear
operations paper.
The March 15 paper, drafted by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, is titled
"Doctrine for Joint Nuclear Operations," providing "guidelines for the
joint employment of forces in nuclear operations . . . for the employment
of U.S. nuclear forces, command and control relationships, and weapons
effect considerations."

"There are numerous nonstate organizations (terrorist, criminal) and about
30 nations with WMD programs, including many regional states," the paper
says in recommending that commanders in the Pacific and other theaters be
given an option of pre-emptive strikes against "rogue" states and
terrorists and "request presidential approval for use of nuclear weapons"
under set conditions.

The paper identifies nuclear, biological and chemical weapons as requiring
pre-emptive strikes to prevent their use.

Allowing pre-emptive nuclear strikes against possible biological and
chemical attacks would effectively contradict a "negative security
assurance" policy declared 10 years ago by the Clinton administration
during an international conference to review the Nuclear Nonproliferation
Treaty.

Creating a treaty committing nuclear powers not to use nuclear weapons
against countries without nuclear weapons remains one of the most
contentious issues for the 35-year-old NPT regime.

A Pentagon official said the paper "is still a draft which has to be
finalized" but indicated that it is aimed at guiding "cross-spectrum"
combatant commanders how to jointly carry out operations based on the
Nuclear Posture Review report adopted three years ago by the Bush
administration.

Citing North Korea, Iran and some other countries as threats, the report
sets out contingencies for which U.S. nuclear strikes must be prepared.

It calls for developing earth-penetrating nuclear bombs to destroy hidden
underground military facilities, including those for storing WMD and
ballistic missiles.

"The nature (of the paper) is to explain not details but cross spectrum
for how to conduct operations," the official said, noting that it "means
for all services -- army, navy, air force and marine."

In 1991 after the end of the Cold War, the United States removed its
ground-based nuclear weapons in Asia and Europe as well as strategic
nuclear warheads on warships and submarines.

But the paper says the U.S. has the capability of reviving sea-based
nuclear arms.

_____________________________

Note: This message comes from the peace-justice-news e-mail mailing list of 
articles and commentaries about peace and social justice issues, activism, etc. 
 If you do not regularly receive mailings from this list or have received this 
message as a forward from someone else and would like to be added to the list, 
send a blank e-mail with the subject "subscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
or you can visit:
http://lists.enabled.com/mailman/listinfo/peace-justice-news  Go to that same 
web address to view the list's archives or to unsubscribe.

E-mail accounts that become full, inactive or out of order for more than a few 
days will be deleted from this list.

FAIR USE NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the 
information in this e-mail is distributed without profit to those who have 
expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational 
purposes.  I am making such material available in an effort to advance 
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, 
scientific, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair 
use' of copyrighted material as provided for in the US Copyright Law.

Reply via email to