Info about subscribing or unsubscribing from this list is at the bottom of this 
message.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://snipurl.com/fx41

Hearings planned on California National Guard's intelligence unit
- By DON THOMPSON, Associated Press Writer
Wednesday, June 29, 2005

A California congresswoman and a state senator are planning plan separate
hearings into whether a California National Guard unit was established as
a spy agency.

Guard spokesmen denied that was the unit's intent but declined to make the
unit's commander available for an interview to fully explain its function.

State Sen. Joseph Dunn, D-Garden Grove, whose budget subcommittee oversees
funding for the California National Guard, said Tuesday he has ordered the
Guard to turn over all documents about the unit, formally called the
Information Synchronization, Knowledge Management and Intelligence Fusion
program. That would include any information collected about citizens.

That last request will be easy, because no such information has been
collected, Guard spokesman Lt. Col. Douglas Hart said.

He said the new unit includes nine soldiers and airmen, two of whom
monitor the military's classified e-mail system and seven who work with
the State Terrorism Threat Assessment Center. That center is the successor
to a terrorism-information unit created after the 2001 attacks and
operated by the state Department of Justice.

The seven help gauge terrorist threats to bridges, buildings and other
structures, said Tom Dresslar, spokesman for Attorney General Bill
Lockyer.

"They don't monitor the activities of groups that are engaged in anti-war
protests or the like," Dresslar said.

The National Guard intelligence unit came to public attention after a
story published Sunday in the San Jose Mercury News. The story referred to
the unit's monitoring of a Mother's Day anti-war demonstration at the
state Capitol that was organized by several peace groups — the Gold Star
Families for Peace, Raging Grannies and CodePink.

An e-mail chain that began in Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's press office
culminated in an advisory a few days before the protest from Col. Jeff
Davis, who oversees the National Guard unit: "our Intell. folks ...
continue to monitor" the event.

Hart said the monitoring amounted to recording television coverage and
reading newspaper articles about the protest. He said the unit did not
infiltrate the groups or observe the rally.

"That's all there was to it. That was the extent of our 'surveillance',"
Hart said.

Margita Thompson, spokeswoman for Schwarzenegger, said, "The
administration is concerned, and we are looking into it."

U.S. Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-San Jose, plans to question California National
Guard officials at a House of Representatives Homeland Security Committee
hearing.

Peninsula Raging Grannies co-chair Ruth Robertson said she suspects the
government has a greater interest, perhaps because of her group's efforts
to dissuade people from enlisting in the military.

"Our median age is 72 — we are not threatening," Robertson said. "We are
all about peace."

Gold Star Families member Cindy Sheehan said she's not bothered: "If
they're monitoring what we're doing, we must be scaring them, and I think
that's great." The group is composed of people whose sons or daughters
have died in military conflicts.

Dunn said he was not reassured by the unit's denials.

"History has not been kind to such assertions by government and military
officials," Dunn said.

He referred to the Vietnam War era, when the military collected
information on more than 100,000 Americans during the 1960s and 1970s.

Questions about the state's anti-terrorism center also arose two years
ago, when Lockyer's Criminal Intelligence Bureau warned Oakland police
about "potential violence" during a protest there.

Police, firing wooden dowels and beanbag projectiles, ultimately injured
at least two dozen protesters. Lockyer subsequently disavowed the tracking
of groups or individuals that avoid violence or other illegal acts, even
if they engage in otherwise harmless civil disobedience.

In a statement this week about the National Guard unit, Lockyer said, "You
have to wonder how monitoring the activities of soldiers' widows and
orphans advances the anti-terrorism effort."

Dunn said that even if the National Guard unit formed last year isn't
spying, the Guard should have cleared the unit with legislators because
"perception could put a cloud over these activities," Dunn said. "Spying
on United States citizens is a radioactive topic."

The Guard on Tuesday abruptly canceled an interview The Associated Press
had scheduled with Col. Robert J. O'Neill, director of the new program,
citing Dunn's planned hearings.

"I would respectfully suggest the Guard is taking absolutely the wrong
approach to shut down information to the public or media about this unit,"
Dunn said. "It only raises the suspicions of the public and the media when
the Guard retreats into a bunker mentality."

_____________________________

Note: This message comes from the peace-justice-news e-mail mailing list of 
articles and commentaries about peace and social justice issues, activism, etc. 
 If you do not regularly receive mailings from this list or have received this 
message as a forward from someone else and would like to be added to the list, 
send a blank e-mail with the subject "subscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
or you can visit:
http://lists.enabled.com/mailman/listinfo/peace-justice-news  Go to that same 
web address to view the list's archives or to unsubscribe.

E-mail accounts that become full, inactive or out of order for more than a few 
days will be deleted from this list.

FAIR USE NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the 
information in this e-mail is distributed without profit to those who have 
expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational 
purposes.  I am making such material available in an effort to advance 
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, 
scientific, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair 
use' of copyrighted material as provided for in the US Copyright Law.

Reply via email to