On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Johannes Schlüter <[email protected]> wrote:
> Still the statement from the first quoted line is correct - the warning > "should be done on "pecl package", not after it has just been uploaded > to pecl". Feel free to patch pear or fill a feature request at http://pear.php.net/pear. > Else one has to revert the tag repackage etc. at a quite late > state when happy to be done. Keep the users happy by making packages available in distros. This is really a non issue. I agree that it should be done in pear too but we do not have the time to look at pear validation code even if it should not be too hard to implement. But a validation must be present in pecl to avoid releases without packages. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org -- PECL development discussion Mailing List (http://pecl.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
