On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Ferenc Kovacs <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Ferenc Kovacs <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Derick Rethans <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 12 May 2014, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: >>> >>> > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Remi Collet <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > > Le 10/05/2014 18:16, PECL Announce a écrit : >>> > > > The new PECL package pthreads-2.0.7 (stable) has been released at >>> > > http://pecl.php.net/. >>> > > >>> > > Reports as 2.0.8... >>> > > >>> > > >>> > maybe one of the three uploads with the same version had the correct >>> > version info. :P >>> > jokes aside: >>> > I think we have so somehow increase the visibility of the version check >>> > warning, or maybe we could introduce an ignore warnings checkbox to the >>> > upload form, and if that's not checked, then any warning will abort the >>> > release. >>> >>> This really ought to be checked at packaging time though. I wonder if >>> it's worth extracting the extension build stuff out of PEAR to make a >>> lightweight thingy that isn't a pain to even look at... >>> >>> And FYI, I was mostly against this check failing if my code wasn't doing >>> the very tight format spec that it would check for. If it finds a value >>> that mismatches, it should abort. And I thought that my latest change >>> didn't change that actually. >>> >>> > ps: and I think it would be nice to have a warning, when somebody >>> > tries to upload a version, which was already uploaded before. >>> >>> Yes. >>> >> >> >> Yeah, packaging time checks would be the best, but given that there were >> no PEAR release in the last 3 years(http://pear.php.net/package/PEAR), >> and I have a couple of fixes/improvements sitting in the the current master >> for more than a year now (https://github.com/pear/pear-core) I'm a bit >> reluctant to try to fix this problem through pear. >> I also agree that it would be better to remove our dependency from pear, >> as it is less and less actively maintained. >> >> > wow, I've almost missed bjori's blogpost, which just summarizes perfectly > what I think about the current situation: > http://bjori.blogspot.hu/2014/05/i-have-dream.html > > and it seems that the pear guys are working on making a new PEAR release (it will be either an 1.10 with the new features from master, or an 1.9.5 bugfix-only first then an 1.10 -- Ferenc Kovács @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu
