Hi Pierrick,

Just trying to follow up on my previous e-mail. I guess you are busy. Do
you need help with maintaining the stomp module?

Thank you,

Gennady

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Gennady Feldman <gen...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Pierrick,
>
> I sent in 2 PRs here: https://github.com/php/pecl-tools-stomp/pulls
>
> - To fix Windows compilation
> - To fix a hang I am seeing and a possibly longer outstanding bug.
>
> Can you take a look at these?
>
> Thank you,
>
> Gennady
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Gennady Feldman <gen...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Pierrick,
>>
>> I am going to revive this thread. I finally had time to look and play
>> with the new version. Ran into a little problem where stomp_connect("tcp://
>> 127.0.0.1:1234") (not a real port) just hangs instead of failiing.
>>
>> Doing telnet i get this:
>>  telnet 127.0.0.1 1234
>> Trying 127.0.0.1...
>> telnet: connect to address 127.0.0.1: Connection refused
>>
>> Tried running "make test" on 1.0.5 which takes about 1 second.. 1.0.6 is
>> running very very slowly... (I don't actually have anything listening so
>> most tests fail).
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Gennady
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Pierrick Charron <pierr...@adoy.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Gennady,
>>>
>>> Yep I thought it was a good thing to add already committed fixes. I'll
>>> try to add other stuff soon.
>>>
>>> Thanks for your help !
>>>
>>>
>>> Pierrick
>>>
>>> On 8 December 2014 at 15:55, Gennady Feldman <gen...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Pierrick,
>>>>
>>>> I saw new stomp 1.0.6.release. Awesome.
>>>>
>>>> Any way to get Windows DLL on the pecl page for 1.0.6 release? I see
>>>> only for 1.0.4.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>>
>>>> Gennady
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Pierrick Charron <pierr...@adoy.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Patches were reviewed and merged. I'll do some tests and release a new
>>>>> version.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> On 5 December 2014 at 19:58, Pierrick Charron <pierr...@adoy.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Gennady,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll have a look at the Pull request during this week-end.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks all for your contributions :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2 December 2014 at 14:53, Gennady Feldman <gen...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Pierrick,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've started converting patches into Pull Requests. I think we have
>>>>>>> 3 open already ready for review.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> P.S. Looks like "issues" is enabled on the repo, probably a mistake?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also noticed that when adding Pull Requests to bugs on bugs.php,net
>>>>>>> it always keeps asking for the code repo for the PECL module. Isn't that
>>>>>>> ALWAYS the same per module?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Gennady
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Pierrick Charron <pierr...@adoy.net
>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm the current maintainer of the Stomp module. I don't have much
>>>>>>>> time to work on improving the module. If you have any blocking issues 
>>>>>>>> I'll
>>>>>>>> try to get some time to fix them. You can also if you want submit 
>>>>>>>> patches
>>>>>>>> using the github repo at https://github.com/php/pecl-tools-stomp
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>> Pierrick
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 24 November 2014 at 17:45, Gennady Feldman <gen...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I've been using Stomp module ( http://pecl.php.net/package/stomp
>>>>>>>>> ) and
>>>>>>>>> noticed that it hasn't been updated in something like ~2 years.
>>>>>>>>> The source
>>>>>>>>> tree looks quiet as well (no new commits since Sun, 17 Mar 2013).
>>>>>>>>> I've
>>>>>>>>> tried to contact the only dev via twitter and e-mail with no
>>>>>>>>> response.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I've been pointed to this mailing list for possible suggestions on
>>>>>>>>> how to
>>>>>>>>> proceed. I'd love to see it updated again. There's also a number
>>>>>>>>> of bugs
>>>>>>>>> that could be fixed as well.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Gennady
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to