Jan Ehrhardt in php.pecl.dev (Thu, 20 Nov 2014 03:05:35 +0100):
>Jakub Zelenka in php.pecl.dev (Wed, 19 Nov 2014 13:33:26 +0000):
>>Forcing all PECL devs to use extra branch is not the right solution IMHO.
>>The best solution would be give devs choice. For example if you don't have
>>'phpng' branch then try to compile master.
>
>This was my idea too. Do not force a PECL dev to use an extra branch,
>but if they do call the extra branch 'phpng'. That way the choice for
>the right bracnch is scriptable.

Current state of affairs:
1. phpng (propro, raphf, http)
2. phpseven (imagick)
3. php7 (redis, msgpack, excel)
4. PHP7 (leveldb)
5. php7-dev (igbinary)
6. seven (pthreads)
7. master for PHP7 and five for PHP5 (krakjoe/strict)

Ouch.
-- 
Jan

-- 
PECL development discussion Mailing List (http://pecl.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to