On Tue, 3 Sep 2019, James Titcumb wrote: > I've discussed open sourcing the extension with the company, which they are > happy to do. They did have one question regarding licenses - is it > acceptable to use an MIT license, or does it have to be BSD/Apache/PHP > licenses only? What is the rationale behind the permitted licenses please?
MIT is fine. The main goal is: No *GPL > Please could you let me know if it is acceptable for me to request to > add the Scout APM package to PECL. That's a question we usually answer after having seen the code :-) > It would make sense for Chris, the lead at Scout APM to have access to > this too - should he request separately, or can this be done in one? Yes, you both should sign up for a PECL account (https://pecl.php.net/account-request.php), and then one of you can suggest the package later. Just make sure you put both of you as <lead> in the package.xml file (otherwise you can't publish a release). cheers, Derick -- PHP 7.4 Release Manager Host of PHP Internals News: https://phpinternals.news Like Xdebug? Become my Patron: https://www.patreon.com/derickr https://derickrethans.nl | https://xdebug.org | https://dram.io twitter: @derickr and @xdebug -- PECL development discussion Mailing List (http://pecl.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
