On 06-08-2024 18:29, Christoph M. Becker wrote:
On 05.08.2024 at 17:21, Frederik Bosch wrote:
On 04-08-2024 20:27, Christoph M. Becker wrote:
I'm generally fine having PECL extensions written in Rust, *if* these
extension clearly signal that requirement. A prominent note in the
documentation would certainly a good first step. Not sure what else
could be done; upgrading the PECL package.xml format might be an option
(does it even signal whether an extension requires an C++ compiler?)
Thank you for your work so far. I think signaling, for me, is no
problem. A specific tag or attribute in the package.xml would be a good
way forward, maybe a new tag <cargo> under <dependencies>. But in the
meantime the description tag and the documentation page can address it too.
That appears to be a sensible compromise for now. If nobody objects, I
think we should proceed in a couple of days.
Do you already have a PECL account, Frederik? (sorry, I've lost track)
Christoph
Hi Christoph,
That's great. I don't have a PECL account yet.
Regards,
Frederik
