Hi Elmar, On Mon, 16 Dec 2024 at 20:56, Elmar Klausmeier <elmar.klausme...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 2. What are the plans to include the current PECL libs in PIE (PHP > Installer for Extensions)? Is every PECL maintainer supposed to include his > extension separately as a separate vendor? > > Regarding question 2, in short, yes, extensions should belong in their own relevant vendor namespace. The current consensus is that existing extensions who are already hosted on the PHP GitHub organisation are okay to use `pecl/*` vendor initially. The ultimate goal however, is that there should be no `pecl/*` vendors. This is just a general goal, we don't have a roadmap at the moment for anything :) Some discussion around this just happened in https://github.com/composer/packagist/issues/1496 - hope this helps provide some context! Thanks James (note, sorry for re-post, seems I wasn't subscribed to the list)
