So it isn't nomore. Omitting paying the annual license maintenance just inhibits downloading updates/new versions and support.
Peder -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 22. november 2004 17:26 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: RE: [PEDA] Cam350 or Gerbtool? (Was 99SE on Windows XP Pro) I use CAM350 now, and have used Gerbtool in the past, and really liked it, but... Last time I looked, a couple of years ago, Gerbtool was pumpkinware, and CAM350 was not. (pumpkinware = timed license, i.e., your software turns into a pumpkin at midnight if you neglect the annual license ransom.) Gary Crowell Micron Technology > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dale Broemer > Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 8:24 AM > To: Protel EDA Discussion List > Subject: [PEDA] Cam350 or Gerbtool? (Was 99SE on Windows XP Pro) > > > Thanks everybody for the scoop. I've loaded XP Pro SP2, and feel > comfortable now. > > Another question if anybody can help. > I'm looking at a new Cam Package. It's come down to either > Gerbtool V14 or Cam350. I have both evals running on the machine, but > it's tough to decide. Gerbtool is by far the cheapest and > seems to have > more features, but Cam350 seems to be smarter in what it > does. I really > like the panelization feature with Cam350 over Gerbtools, although > that's not a deciding factor. > > Any thoughts from those of you that use one or the other or both? The > price is not an issue here. Functionality, usability and > reliability is > everything. > > Thanks! > Dale > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Harry > Selfridge > Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 10:50 AM > To: Protel EDA Discussion List > Subject: Re: [PEDA] 99SE on Windows XP Pro > > I wouldn't calll it insight, but it runs on XP Pro SP2 just fine here. > > At 09:30 AM 11/19/04, you wrote: > > I know Protel does not like Windows XP, but has/is anybody > running it > >on XP Pro? Not sure if I should setup Pro on my machine or re-install > >Windows 2000. > > > >Thanks for any insight! > >Dale > snip > > > > > ____________________________________________________________ > You are subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum > > To Post messages: > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Unsubscribe and Other Options: > http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com > > Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004): > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] > > Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current): > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] > > ____________________________________________________________ You are subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum To Post messages: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe and Other Options: http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004): http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current): http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] ____________________________________________________________ You are subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum To Post messages: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe and Other Options: http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004): http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current): http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
