> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 10 June 2005 20:22
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [PEDA] Worth it to upgrade to DXP?
> 
> UPS just drove in with a package of Altium's latest sales 
> pitch to try to get us old stick-in-the-mud 99SE users to 
> upgrade by June 30. If all the marketing-ese were actually 
> factual, and all those features actually worked, it just 
> might be worthwhile to upgrade. Can anybody here give any 
> insight, pro or con, on whether with SP3, DXP is finally 
> worth the upgrade $$$??
> 

Steve

Would be better if you could say what features you like in AD that would
make your life easier and then asked if the worked or any caveats for using
them.

Don't expect the UI to be as intuative as 99SE, a lot of things have been
changed, I used to think it was because AD was hard to drive, its not so,
its because 99SE is so much easier to drive ;-)

I have found more issues with getting 99SE designs to behave correctly under
AD than with anything else, but the translator is better, except, for me the
use of query language for globals, it still stumps me on a daily basis, but
its here to stay so I think it's a like it or lump it option.

If you need to send out 99SE files then you will need to watch out what
features are used in AD, as they are not all backwards compatable to 99SE.
In this case you won't be able to use some new features, so some
limitations.

Should really grab a demo and have a go. But if 99SE meets all your
requirements (no need of the new features or functionality) then really
there is no need to change.

John



 
____________________________________________________________
You are subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum

To Post messages:
mailto:[email protected]

Unsubscribe and Other Options:
http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com

Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
 
Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to