Andrew,
 
I have been a Protel critic, but I still find it to be solid, stable and 
infinitely configurable, in its P99SE and AD6 editions. And I am not paid for 
this.
 
Igor



> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:10:48 -0400> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: 
> [email protected]> Subject: Re: [PEDA] Open source equivalent to Protel> > 
> We use 2004 here at Avtron. Same conclusions. It is one of the most rock> 
> solid applications I've ever used. I've been using it for as long as> I've 
> been using Protel. It's not as tailored to EDA, but unlike Protel,> it is 
> solid, stable, and infinitely configurable.> > Sad to hear that it uses the 
> new virtual dongling that has become the> norm. Understandable from the 
> software giant's POV (need I mention the> wholesale and factory-sized IT 
> thievery that certain far-east nations> have and are engaging in?), but sad 
> all the same. > > >-----Original Message-----> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 
> >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Smith> >Sent: Thursday, April 
> 26, 2007 2:51 PM> >To: Protel EDA Discussion List> >Subject: Re: [PEDA] Open 
> source equivalent to Protel> >> >Geoff,> >> >We have AutoCAD 2007. As far as 
> major bugs, there are none to report.> >It has on rare occasions locked up on 
> me. I have used AutoCAD > >11, 12, 2000, 2004 and it has always been a very 
> stable > >product. There have been only 2 patches released for 2007. > 
> >Printing has gotten incrementally easier with each release. > >They added a 
> PDF printout that is decent but could use a > >little improvement as far as 
> resolution is concerned. Moving, > >editing, rotating and dimensioning have 
> been marginally > >improved over time. Editing blocks has gotten much 
> easier.> >Most of the old commands from the DOS versions still work. > 
> >Supposedly some of the biggest improvements have come in 3D > >but we rarely 
> use that here. Customizing the menus and > >toolbars has been greatly 
> improved along with text editing and > >can now be linked to spreadsheets. I 
> know that some claim it > >is not intuitive for the casual user, but I have 
> found it to > >be a powerful, useful, and very stable piece of software.> 
> >What I dislike the most about AutoCAD is that I can no longer > >have a 
> second copy of it on my home system unless we purchase > >their subscription 
> plan, a $495 adder. > >> >Regards,> >Steve Smith> >Product Engineer> >Staco 
> Energy Products Co. > >Web Site: www.stacoenergy.com> >& www.stacopower.com> 
> >> >DISCLAIMER AND/OR CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: > >This message, including any 
> attached materials, is intended > >solely for the use of the individual or 
> entity to whom it is > >addressed and may contain information that is 
> privileged, > >confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. 
> > >If the reader of this electronic mail transmission is not the > >intended 
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any > >dissemination, distribution, 
> or copying of this communication > >is strictly prohibited. If you have 
> received this > >communication in error, please e-mail or call Staco Energy > 
> >Products Co. at (937) 253-1191. Thank you for your cooperation.> >> >> >> 
> >-----Original Message-----> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >[mailto:[EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]> >On Behalf Of Geoff Harland> >Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 
> 11:18 PM> >To: [email protected]> >Subject: Re: [PEDA] Open source 
> equivalent to Protel> >> >I have never tried actually installing and 
> evaluating gEDA as > >of yet (either under Windows or Linux), but while 
> reading some > >documentaton hosted by its website (late last year, IIRC), I 
> > >gather that the "standard" version of the PCB package for gEDA > >(i.e. in 
> which no modifications have been made to any of its > >source code) does not 
> provide a bottom side Paste Mask layer > >(? and doesn't provide a bottom 
> side Overlay layer either ?).> >> >So even though I personally loathe 
> assorted shortcomings > >within Altium Designer, I don't think that the 
> intellectual > >giants within Altium's management have too much to worry 
> about > >as far as competition from gEDA is concerned, or at least not > >for 
> the time being. (There are doubtless at least some > >sufficiently determined 
> people who are prepared to jump > >through all of the hoops necessary to 
> install and subsequently > >use gEDA, and who are also happy with its 
> capabilities, but I > >also surmise that such people would be unlikely to 
> purchase AD > >in any case.)> >> >I can't recall its name or other details 
> right now, but I do > >have recollections of hearing about yet another open 
> source > >and/or freeware PCB design application which runs on Windows > >(or 
> else either on Windows or Linux). However I would still be > >surprised if it 
> is significantly superior to gEDA as far as > >its capabilities are 
> concerned, so for the time being, anyone > >wanting a "serious" PCB design 
> applications still has to > >decide which of the commercial products is 
> "least vile" in nature.> >> >In that regard, the market for PCB design 
> applications is > >relatively small (compared with the market for other > 
> >applications such as word processing, etc), and it is also not > 
> >straightforward to write the source code for such applications > >if they 
> are to be of a truly satisfactory nature (as far as > >both user-friendliness 
> and capabilities are concerned). So > >while it would be nice to think that 
> AD could be a lot less > >buggy than what it is, it also seems that the odds 
> are still > >stacked against its users ever getting to enjoy such an 
> outcome.> >> >It has been many years since I last used AutoCAD (the last > 
> >time I did so, it was still a DOS version), but my > >recollections of using 
> it was that it didn't seem to be > >afflicted with bugs of a "basic" or 
> "fundamental" nature > >(unlike another certain application), and as such, I 
> am > >wondering if there is anyone here who has had any experience > >in 
> using the most recent version (or otherwise another > >relatively recent 
> version), and is thus able to report on what > >it is like, as far as bugs, 
> defects, and other shortcomings > >are concerned. I would be surprised to 
> hear that it is totally > >bug-free, or even that bugs are almost unheard of, 
> but I am > >still curious as to whether users have to contend with defects > 
> >which afflict elementary procedures (such as creating > >printouts, moving 
> and/or rotating objects, etc), and/or > >whether they have to jump through 
> hoops, or otherwise contend > >with commands of a "clunky" nature, when 
> undertaking > >elementary procedures.> >> >I am well aware that AutoCAD is 
> not a cheap application to purchase.> >That said, nor is another certain 
> application in this day and > >age, so it would definitely be interesting to 
> learn whether > >AutoCAD is "shipped" to a distinctly higher standard...> >> 
> >Regards,> >Geoff Harland.> >> >> >>I agree.> >>> >>If it's the tired and 
> blue "Kill Bill" mentality so prevalent amongst > >>certain 
> anti-establishment quarters, perhaps someone might even go so > >>far as to 
> suggest that the disgruntled, aging hippy boss get some > >>professional 
> psychological assistance with his um...problems.> >>> >>Or I'd suggest that 
> you consider a job change in the near future, as > >>he's likely to screw 
> your career without a second thought in order to > >>further his political 
> objectives. After all, you're talking about > >>someone who wants to drop a 
> package which your company already > >>presumably owns (gleaned from your 
> post) for a relatively unproven > >>open-source product, operating on a 
> platform which itself to > >this date > >>has not really been proven to be 
> economically viable for > >circuit design> >> >>and analysis outside of the 
> hobbyist realm.> >>> >>Even the entry that Mr Selfridge claims as a Linux 
> equivalent > >is a hack> >> >>in comparison to Protel...8 layers?> >>> >>And 
> I'm a fan of open source. But let's get real.> >>> >>aj> >> >Send instant 
> messages to your online friends > >http://au.messenger.yahoo.com > > > 
> >____________________________________________________________> >You are 
> subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum> >> >To Post messages:> 
> >mailto:[email protected]> >> >Unsubscribe and Other Options:> 
> >http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com> >> >Browse or 
> Search Old Archives (2001-2004):> >http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]> > > >Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current):> 
> >http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]> >> >> > > 
> >____________________________________________________________> >You are 
> subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum> >> >To Post messages:> 
> >mailto:[email protected]> >> >Unsubscribe and Other Options:> 
> >http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com> >> >Browse or 
> Search Old Archives (2001-2004):> >http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]> > > >Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current):> 
> >http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]> >> >> > > This e-mail 
> transmission and its attachments may contain information from Avtron 
> Manufacturing, Inc. that is proprietary, privileged and/or confidential and 
> is intended exclusively for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. Any use, 
> copying, retention or disclosure by any person other than the intended 
> recipient or the intended recipient's designees is strictly prohibited. If 
> you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately 
> by return e-mail and delete all copies.> > > 
> ____________________________________________________________> You are 
> subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum> > To Post messages:> 
> mailto:[email protected]> > Unsubscribe and Other Options:> 
> http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com> > Browse or 
> Search Old Archives (2001-2004):> http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]> > Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current):> 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]> 
_________________________________________________________________
Invite your mail contacts to join your friends list with Windows Live Spaces. 
It's easy!
http://spaces.live.com/spacesapi.aspx?wx_action=create&wx_url=/friends.aspx&mkt=en-us
 
____________________________________________________________
You are subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum

To Post messages:
mailto:[email protected]

Unsubscribe and Other Options:
http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com

Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to