It might be convenient sometimes, but I don't think it increases the power
of PEGs.
You can always rewrite an expression like "(E1 break | E2)*" as "(!E1 E2)*
E1?"
I wonder if there are any grammars that can't be expressed without break?
2011/1/1 Ondřej Bílka <nel...@seznam.cz>
> Hello
> as I started to LR/RR eliminator I noticed that break is handy
>
> It gave idea to introduce break statement to break iteration.
> For example C strings could be parsed as
> '"' ('"' break | '\"' | . )*
> whad do you think about it
> --
>
> SCSI's too wide.
>
> _______________________________________________
> PEG mailing list
> PEG@lists.csail.mit.edu
> https://lists.csail.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/peg
>
_______________________________________________
PEG mailing list
PEG@lists.csail.mit.edu
https://lists.csail.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/peg
