Phyllis Chiasson <[email protected]> wrote: >Jon & List, > >I didn't mean it was worth reading because it was a great treatise of >pragmatism, Peirce's or otherwise, but because it wasn't and it was in the NY >Times. I wonder if there is a message here for us-something like taking >control of the way pragmatism is defined. I think a piece like this needs >careful, objective analysis and refutation. I thought the comments about >social Darwinism were especially important, considering how long it has held >on as a justification for the sort of economic and social specialness we're >encountering today. Gospel of greed might be a good place to start. Maybe we >need to form a PAC for effectively communicating Peirce's concepts the masses. > >Regards, >Phyllis
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
