Start with double bind. No two words so joined are more important, thanks to Gregory Bateson. :) PS. But I see your point.
*@stephencrose <https://twitter.com/stephencrose>* On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Jon Awbrey <[email protected]> wrote: > JA:http://web.archive.org/web/20140630220000/http:// > permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/13446 > SR:http://web.archive.org/web/20140701002000/http:// > permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/13447 > JA:http://web.archive.org/web/20140701003000/http:// > permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/13448 > SR:http://web.archive.org/web/20140701024001/http:// > permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/13449 > PC:http://web.archive.org/web/20140701031800/http:// > permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/13450 > > Phyllis Chiasson wrote: > > > > I have always thought Peirce considered "surprise" as the beginning of > doubt, > > and doubt the thing that must be settled to have enough belief to act. > > 1st, 2nd, 3rd. > > Stephen, Phyllis, List, > > I do not think Peirce is being dogmatic so much as simply making a > definition. He wraps a boundary about a class of processes that he finds > worthy of interest for all sorts of reasons and he affixes the word > "inquiry" to that class. He knows the name is not always so apt but what's > in a name is the object class and not the name for its own sake. > > | The irritation of doubt causes a struggle to attain a state of belief. > | I shall term this struggle ''inquiry'', though it must be admitted > | that this is sometimes not a very apt designation. > | > | http://www.peirce.org/writings/p107.html > > If we peer through the cloud of words surrounding the class of phenomena > thus labeled, we find many features in common. There is a tension among > two or more alternatives. Hence the words ambiguity, doubt, double take, > dubiety, duplicity, equivocality, perplexity, and so on. The alternatives > may come in different flavors, intensities, or modes, and they may arise > from different sources. Hence the words anomaly, novelty, and surprise > that reflect a tension between what we expect or what is familiar and what > we observe in actuality. All these words point in their own nuanced ways > to roughly the same sort of affective-cognitive situation. > > Once the general idea of inquiry is settled enough to inquire further, > there are any number of questions we might ask next. > > I have a few in mind ... > > Jon > > > -- > > academia: http://independent.academia.edu/JonAwbrey > my word press blog: http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/ > inquiry list: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/ > isw: http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/JLA > oeiswiki: http://www.oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey > facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/JonnyCache > > > ----------------------------- > PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON > PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to > [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L > but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the > BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm > . > > > > > >
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
