You can try to explain an abductive example within a syllogistic format, eg, 

Minor premise (the surprising observation)
Major premise (the assumed hypothesis of IF-THEN)
Conclusion (THEN...the minor premise has validity within this major premise, 
but you still have to format it properly...

This has nothing to do with Sung's syllogism. The format that Sung is 
presenting his syllogism in - remains fallacious. It remains as an illicit 
major fallacy because his major premise is distributed in the conclusion and 
undistributed in the premise.

I've given examples - and that's as much as I'll do.

Edwina
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Esteban Fredin 
  To: [email protected] 
  Cc: [email protected] ; Sungchul Ji 
  Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2014 8:03 PM
  Subject: [biosemiotics:6092] Re: Burgin's Fundamental Triads as


  I enjoy Sungchul's blending of Peircian semiotic with other fields. Though I 
do find it hard to follow at some parts and the details are murky. 
  Regarding the syllogism I think it has the form of abduction presented 'on a 
new list of categories.'


    On 05/07/2014 5:59 PM, "Edwina Taborsky" <[email protected]> wrote:

    Whether you reformat it with 'C-B' or B-C', it's still invalid.

    B-C which is how you originally set it up, is formally invalid - Illicit 
Major
    C-B is formally invalid - Illicit Minor.

    Here's another example.

    All soccer players are men.
    All soccer players are young.
    Therefore, all men are young.

    And even if you try to reverse the conclusion into
    All who are young are men...it's still fallacious.


    Edwina

    ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sungchul Ji" <[email protected]>

    To: "Edwina Taborsky" <[email protected]>
    Cc: "Sungchul Ji" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; 
<[email protected]>
    Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2014 6:46 PM
    Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Burgin's Fundamental Triads as Peirceasn Signs.



    > Edwina wrote:
    >
    > ". . . your syllogism is both formally false and         (p70514-1)
    > logical...

-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to