Thanks for the confirmation, Paul!  I hope we can get a range of peircean
Philosophers as well as Peircean scholars taking the lead in the study of
Frederik Stjernfelt's book, as he's pretty close to the ideal of being both,
I think.

 

I'm attaching an updated outline of the seminar, which still has many blanks
for threadleaders. It's now confirmed that the seminar will be conducted
simultaneously on the peirce-l and biosemiotics lists, and we're aiming to
start August 17 with Frederik making the introductory post. I'll keep you
posted as the agenda develops.

 

gary f.

 

From: paul eduardo [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: 29-Jul-14 5:47 PM
To: Gary Fuhrman; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [PEIRCE-L] Invigorating Philosophy with Natural Propositions

 

Gary, List
, I agree with the difference between PS and PP, especially after having
been in the SIAP at Oregon University in EUGENE.
There, in a conference about  political philosophy, it  was raised  that
political philosophy can be  considered a vision, or be used  as a tool.
Philosophy in general, and pragmatism in particular, can be considered  in
both aspects. In first place, philosophy like a vision can be studied from
the point of view of a scholar. But if philosophy must be considered like a
science with functions of the others  and the duty of improve the world, so,
we should consider use the different concepts of philosophy in general and
the peircean concepts in particular.
This kind of doubt is own of the philosophy, but it doesn't in  physics, in
which the concepts are used like tools by the applied sciences like
engineering.
I am very interested in the application of peircean concepts in the
hypothesis generation, so I can be considered like a PP, but I need all the
investigation of the PS to do my work. The ideal would be be PP and PS at
the same time. But this would be very difficult, because it would demand a
lot of time.
So, I prefer use the concepts and relations discovered by PS like tools to
solve  quotidian problems.
I mean, that the two positions are necessary, philosophy like a vision and
philosophical concepts like tools, PS and PP; and this demonstrate that
between theory and practice there are a continuity, although the human
limitation forces us to break this continuity, which is reestablished in the
research community.
Paul

  _____  

-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to