What I was getting out of Ch. 2, was a focus on the nature of reality and existence. I got the sense that psychologism was based strictly around individual existence, in particular, that of the human brain/mind - and that this ignored any consideration of the nature of reality, i.e., of universals or generalities.
However, if one considers that life is made up of both reality and existence, then, one moves beyond the confines of the individual psychological perception/knowledge - and into the realm of Mind..not the human mind..but the Natural Mind. This then brings in 'reasoning' or logic...and 'natural argumentation', which seems to be, the dicisign. Edwina
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
