Jeff D., Jon,

I'd just like to note that the questions of triads versus trichotomies is something that we've discussed a number of times at peirce-l over the years. For my part, I like using those words in the way that Jon and others have recommended - 'triad' for the triadically related sign, object, interpretant, which are involved as the correlates in genuinely triadic action, and 'trichotomy' for three-fold classifications, especially categorially correlated ones such as qualisign, sinsign, legisign. However, it should be noted that there are passages in which Peirce calls trichotomies 'triads', and other passages by Peirce that make no sense unless one follows the 'triad'-versus-'trichotomy' distinction. I don't have the quotes handy but we've been over it many times. A separate issue is the one about whether the sign-object-interpretant triad is also categorially correlated trichotomy.

Best, Ben

On 10/1/2014 11:10 PM, Jeffrey Brian Downard wrote:

Hello Jon,

If you have links to the earlier discussions of the distinction between "triadicities" 
and "trichotomies", I'd like to take a look.  In addition to being interested in 
distinction you are making, I'd like to read more about how you are thinking about the projection 
of the triadic relations onto the mutually exclusive and exhaustive partitions of a domain.

In his monograph <Reading Peirce Reading>, Richard Smyth makes much of the conceptions of 
the restrictions and limitations that apply to a given domain of inquiry.  I'd like to see how 
your account of the partitions of the domain compares to his reconstruction of some arguments 
Peirce develops in "How to Make Our Ideas Clear."

Thanks,

Jeff

Jeff Downard
Associate Professor
Department of Philosophy
NAU
(o) 523-8354
________________________________________
From: Jon Awbrey [[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 7:44 PM
To: Peirce List 1
Subject: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Natural Propositions • Selected Passages
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to