Section 11 of Chapter 3 follows up on the previous section by pointing out that the "continuous predicate" idea provides an "argument for the unity of the proposition" which is different from the argument presented earlier, in 3.7. However, although Frederik emphasizes the difference, but concludes that "both of them are necessary for Peirce's account for the unity of propositions." To me they seem to be analyses of the same semiotic phenomenon (the Dicisign) from slightly different angles. But this is a short section and I won't comment on it further.
gary f.
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
