We think sequentially by necessity. Whoops. Thought gone. But seriously, I wonder if triangles do not move. In other words they cannot be fixed. Does that mean that no product of triadic thinking can be fixed. Probably so. Generals are fixed. Maybe in the CSP way of communal consensus and whatever other confomatory evidences there may be. Values are generals. Good generals are ontological. Bad generals are just bad. Triadic philosophy by advocating triadic thinking espouses triangles over monadic or binary shapes but the reason is they can nest so as things move they can bring along what works such as the ethical index or the name of the root triad reality, ethics, aesthetics. But each nanosecond and each time that consciousness believes itself to be operative life itself unfolds so that expressions and actions are impossible to see as the same from time to time. Maybe a triangle is like a wave so its form remains the same and even its location could be said not to substantially change, but its content always changes. That would suggest that the question remains.
Books http://buff.ly/15GfdqU Art: http://buff.ly/1wXAxbl Gifts: http://buff.ly/1wXADj3
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
